Body Mass Distribution and Body-Size Structure of Brazilian Terrestrial Mammals: A Reassessment of Conventional Size Classes

Body mass is a fundamental functional trait influencing mammalian biology, ecology, and conservation status. In Neotropical studies, species are conventionally classified into small (<1 kg), medium (1–44 kg), and large (>44 kg) mammals. However, whether these operational thresholds reflect natural discontinuities in body mass across regional faunas remains untested. We compiled body mass data for 529 Brazilian terrestrial mammal species across nine orders (excluding Chiroptera) to evaluate body-size distribution and test whether conventional categories align with empirical body-mass structure using Gaussian finite mixture modeling (GMM). Small mammals dominated the fauna (73.9%), followed by medium (24.8%) and large species (1.3%). A four-component Gaussian mixture model was retained as a biologically interpretable representation of body-mass structure. The estimated component means were approximately 22, 65, 298, and 1210 g. However, the observed body-mass ranges of species assigned to the components were not fully separated, particularly for the broad fourth component. These results suggest substantial structure within the lower portion of the body-mass distribution, while highlighting the limitations of interpreting probabilistic components as discrete body-size classes. We provide a standardized framework for body-size classification to enhance comparability across macroecological and conservation studies in the Neotropics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecologies
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies7040122
Primary Topic
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Body Mass Distribution and Body-Size Structure of Brazilian Terrestrial Mammals: A Reassessment of Conventional Size Classes

Guilherme Siniciato Terra Garbino, Huilquer Francisco Vogel, Alan Deivid Pereira, David Lins Fernandes Leiroza Lovato et al.
Ecologies
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
article

Body Mass Distribution and Body-Size Structure of Brazilian Terrestrial Mammals: A Reassessment of Conventional Size Classes

Guilherme Siniciato Terra Garbino, Huilquer Francisco Vogel, Alan Deivid Pereira, David Lins Fernandes Leiroza Lovato, Ana Paula Vidotto‐Magnoni, Gabriel Brambila Milleo
article en

Abstract

Body mass is a fundamental functional trait influencing mammalian biology, ecology, and conservation status. In Neotropical studies, species are conventionally classified into small (<1 kg), medium (1–44 kg), and large (>44 kg) mammals. However, whether these operational thresholds reflect natural discontinuities in body mass across regional faunas remains untested. We compiled body mass data for 529 Brazilian terrestrial mammal species across nine orders (excluding Chiroptera) to evaluate body-size distribution and test whether conventional categories align with empirical body-mass structure using Gaussian finite mixture modeling (GMM). Small mammals dominated the fauna (73.9%), followed by medium (24.8%) and large species (1.3%). A four-component Gaussian mixture model was retained as a biologically interpretable representation of body-mass structure. The estimated component means were approximately 22, 65, 298, and 1210 g. However, the observed body-mass ranges of species assigned to the components were not fully separated, particularly for the broad fourth component. These results suggest substantial structure within the lower portion of the body-mass distribution, while highlighting the limitations of interpreting probabilistic components as discrete body-size classes. We provide a standardized framework for body-size classification to enhance comparability across macroecological and conservation studies in the Neotropics.

EcologiesVol. 7(4)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Universidade Estadual do Paraná (BR)
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon