A Dynamic Control-Volume Data-Reconciliation Framework for Transient Methane Pyrolysis in a Thermal Plasma Reactor
Transient methane pyrolysis in a DC thermal plasma reactor was assessed using a zero-dimensional control-volume reconstruction and elemental balance consistency framework. Programmed Ar and CNG feed rates, time-aligned outlet gas readings, a conditional Ar cross-sensitivity correction for the H2 detector, and finite gas holdup were combined with C/H/O residuals, a lumped thermal state, and exploratory kinetic and exergy scenarios. For the principal 10–25 min interval, the nominal conditional CH4 conversion is 94.2%; the 93.2–95.1% Monte Carlo interval propagates selected nominal analyzer specifications only and is not an experimental confidence interval because the raw H2 readings (approximately 51–59 vol.%; the corrected mean is 59.2 vol.%) exceeded the listed 0–10 vol.% range. Deterministic ±20% H2-channel gain scenarios give 91.95–95.46% conversion but are not calibration-error bounds. A hypothetical air-ingress scenario that closes the mean oxygen balance yields 93.84% conversion with a remaining hydrogen residual of 13.35 mol-H min−1; C2Hγ scenarios do not simultaneously reconcile the hydrogen balance and reported recovered carbonaceous mass. The dynamic and quasi-steady outlet-flow reconstructions nearly coincide (mean ratio: 1.0001; effective gas residence time: ≈0.25 s versus an estimated 1000 s lumped thermal scale). The 4–34 min integrated carbon-equivalent residual is 2.31 kg-C, compared with 1.875 kg of reported recovered carbonaceous material of unverified purity and run attribution. Measured H2 is approximately 49% of the ideal CH4-to-C(s)-plus-2H2 yield, with no unique explanation for the hydrogen deficit. The oxygen residual (−0.143 mol-O/min) is approximately 11.4 times the oxygen input from the stated CNG feed and is therefore not a satisfactory oxygen closure. Reduced kinetic and exergy calculations remain exploratory, assumption-dependent diagnostics, not independently validated performance predictions.
Authors
- Zh Kiss’ovski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3353-5709)
- Eduardo Sant’Ana Petraconi Prado (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-2347)
- Argemiro Soares da Silva Sobrinho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-9176)
- Rodrigo Sávio Pessoa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-9747)
- F. Miranda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-4592)
- Alexei Mikhailovich Essiptchouk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8149-4676)
- Douglas Marcel Gonçalves Leite (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-6171)
- Gilberto Petraconi Filho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-4237)
- Rafael Segantine
Institutions
- Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (BR)
- Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" (BG)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hydrogen
- Published
- 2026-11-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7040191
- Primary Topic
- Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00