Embedding into policy a benchmarking approach to strengthen healthy retail practices in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores

Abstract Background Globally, public policy is increasingly being developed with the goal of modifying food retail environments to support improved population health. This work examines the translation of a retail health promotion intervention into national policy. A co-designed benchmarking model implemented in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores to strengthen health-enabling food retail policy and practice was considered feasible and valuable by stakeholders. This study informs the scale-up and -out of the model across remote Australia, determining pathways and considerations for its embedding into public policy. Methods This prospective qualitative policy analysis was informed by the PRACTical planning for Implementation and Scale-up guide and reported against the COREQ Protocol for Qualitative Research. It included desktop mapping of relevant national and jurisdictional policy through 2025-26, interviews with 15 national and jurisdictional policymakers and 38 implementers of the benchmarking model in the Northern Territory, and guided roundtable discussion with 47 delegates at the 2025 Benchmarking project workshop. Results A clear pathway for embedding the benchmarking model Australia-wide through its positioning as an implementation strategy for voluntary national policies was identified. Key considerations for whether the model can be effective in this pathway were ensuring equitable uptake of the voluntary policies within which the model is embedded, and the workforce capacity to implement it. Key actions suggested to support successful implementation included strengthening community store governance and industry practice, evolution in the remote food system workforce, and coordinated action and communication between and from national and jurisdictional entities. Conclusions Uptake of the Benchmarking model alongside a voluntary policy approach is underpinned by industry expectations around implementing best practice for community health, adequate resourcing, and community involvement in store governance. Where these elements are not strong, voluntary policy approaches must be supported by multiple, coordinated actions to achieve uptake and impact. These insights are useful to policy makers designing policy around healthy food retailing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Public Health
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-02128-2
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Embedding into policy a benchmarking approach to strengthen healthy retail practices in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores

Simone Nalatu, Emma Tonkin, Bronwyn L. Fredericks, Julie Kay Brimblecombe et al.
Archives of Public Health
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Embedding into policy a benchmarking approach to strengthen healthy retail practices in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores

Simone Nalatu, Emma Tonkin, Bronwyn L. Fredericks, Julie Kay Brimblecombe, Adam Barnes, Christina Mary Pollard, Eddie Miles, Amanda Lee, Megan Ferguson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Globally, public policy is increasingly being developed with the goal of modifying food retail environments to support improved population health. This work examines the translation of a retail health promotion intervention into national policy. A co-designed benchmarking model implemented in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community stores to strengthen health-enabling food retail policy and practice was considered feasible and valuable by stakeholders. This study informs the scale-up and -out of the model across remote Australia, determining pathways and considerations for its embedding into public policy. Methods This prospective qualitative policy analysis was informed by the PRACTical planning for Implementation and Scale-up guide and reported against the COREQ Protocol for Qualitative Research. It included desktop mapping of relevant national and jurisdictional policy through 2025-26, interviews with 15 national and jurisdictional policymakers and 38 implementers of the benchmarking model in the Northern Territory, and guided roundtable discussion with 47 delegates at the 2025 Benchmarking project workshop. Results A clear pathway for embedding the benchmarking model Australia-wide through its positioning as an implementation strategy for voluntary national policies was identified. Key considerations for whether the model can be effective in this pathway were ensuring equitable uptake of the voluntary policies within which the model is embedded, and the workforce capacity to implement it. Key actions suggested to support successful implementation included strengthening community store governance and industry practice, evolution in the remote food system workforce, and coordinated action and communication between and from national and jurisdictional entities. Conclusions Uptake of the Benchmarking model alongside a voluntary policy approach is underpinned by industry expectations around implementing best practice for community health, adequate resourcing, and community involvement in store governance. Where these elements are not strong, voluntary policy approaches must be supported by multiple, coordinated actions to achieve uptake and impact. These insights are useful to policy makers designing policy around healthy food retailing.

Archives of Public Health
The University of Queensland (AU), Curtin University (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Menzies School of Health Research (AU), Health and Wellbeing Queensland (AU), Monash University (AU)
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon