Explainable machine learning for predicting kidney disease progression defined by changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes: a single-centre retrospective study

Background and objectives Routine clinical data may contain information on the future course of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study assessed the predictive performance and interpretability of seven machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to baseline measurements. Materials and methods This single-centre retrospective study included 382 patients with T2DM evaluated between January 2024 and December 2025. Progression was ascertained at a fixed three-month reassessment and defined according to KDIGO criteria as a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) category with a fall of at least 25% from baseline or an increase in albuminuria category. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression selected 22 of 52 candidate predictors before repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation, and a sensitivity analysis repeated the selection within training folds. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to interpret the models. Results Progression occurred in 162 patients (42.4%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.682 for the radial-basis support vector machine (SVM) and 0.671 for LASSO logistic regression; when feature selection was repeated within training folds, the AUCs were 0.603 and 0.640, respectively. LASSO logistic regression was retained for interpretation because its coefficients are transparent and its AUC did not differ significantly from that of SVM. At the Youden threshold, its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.648, 0.650, 0.577 and 0.715. The best full model did not differ significantly from the best seven-variable model (ΔAUC 0.046; p = 0.052). After Platt scaling, the Brier score of the LASSO model was 0.225 and the calibration slope 1.39. Diabetes duration, total cholesterol and ferritin were associated with progression in an exploratory multivariable analysis. Conclusions Routine baseline data provided modest discrimination, part of which reflected optimism from feature selection performed before cross-validation. The incremental clinical value of the model has not been established, and external, preferably prospective, validation is required before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1983789
Primary Topic
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Explainable machine learning for predicting kidney disease progression defined by changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes: a single-centre retrospective study

Ozan Aydemir, Mehmet Erdem
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
article

Explainable machine learning for predicting kidney disease progression defined by changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes: a single-centre retrospective study

Ozan Aydemir, Mehmet Erdem
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives Routine clinical data may contain information on the future course of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study assessed the predictive performance and interpretability of seven machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to baseline measurements. Materials and methods This single-centre retrospective study included 382 patients with T2DM evaluated between January 2024 and December 2025. Progression was ascertained at a fixed three-month reassessment and defined according to KDIGO criteria as a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) category with a fall of at least 25% from baseline or an increase in albuminuria category. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression selected 22 of 52 candidate predictors before repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation, and a sensitivity analysis repeated the selection within training folds. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to interpret the models. Results Progression occurred in 162 patients (42.4%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.682 for the radial-basis support vector machine (SVM) and 0.671 for LASSO logistic regression; when feature selection was repeated within training folds, the AUCs were 0.603 and 0.640, respectively. LASSO logistic regression was retained for interpretation because its coefficients are transparent and its AUC did not differ significantly from that of SVM. At the Youden threshold, its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.648, 0.650, 0.577 and 0.715. The best full model did not differ significantly from the best seven-variable model (ΔAUC 0.046; p = 0.052). After Platt scaling, the Brier score of the LASSO model was 0.225 and the calibration slope 1.39. Diabetes duration, total cholesterol and ferritin were associated with progression in an exploratory multivariable analysis. Conclusions Routine baseline data provided modest discrimination, part of which reflected optimism from feature selection performed before cross-validation. The incremental clinical value of the model has not been established, and external, preferably prospective, validation is required before clinical use.

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 17
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon