Traffic Accident Detection from Sudden Vehicle Stops in Surveillance Camera Videos

Accident detection in surveillance video can shorten emergency response times, but a practical detector must also raise few false alarms in normal traffic. This study evaluates an interpretable pipeline that detects vehicles with YOLOv3, tracks them with MOSSE, and raises an alarm when a pixel-based motion-change score exceeds a fixed threshold. On 15 videos that all contain accidents, the pipeline detected 60% of the accidents. However, on the public TAD benchmark, which also contains normal traffic, its score did not separate accident videos from normal videos (test AUC 0.48), and it raised alarms in 14 of 16 normal videos. Controlled experiments traced this failure mainly to tracking errors and the pixel-based score. We therefore propose a configuration that detects vehicles with YOLOv3, tracks them with ByteTrack, and scores each vehicle by its speed just before it stops suddenly. It raised the test AUC to 0.88 and the F1 score from 0.67 to 0.83. Its ranking performance was statistically indistinguishable from that of a fine-tuned video transformer (AUC 0.84), although it needs no training on accident videos and identifies the vehicle and frame behind each alarm. Because false alarms remain frequent, the method is suited only to pre-screening by human operators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162111089
Primary Topic
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Traffic Accident Detection from Sudden Vehicle Stops in Surveillance Camera Videos

Ahmet Sayar, Yılmaz Dikilitaş
Applied Sciences
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
article

Traffic Accident Detection from Sudden Vehicle Stops in Surveillance Camera Videos

Ahmet Sayar, Yılmaz Dikilitaş
article en

Abstract

Accident detection in surveillance video can shorten emergency response times, but a practical detector must also raise few false alarms in normal traffic. This study evaluates an interpretable pipeline that detects vehicles with YOLOv3, tracks them with MOSSE, and raises an alarm when a pixel-based motion-change score exceeds a fixed threshold. On 15 videos that all contain accidents, the pipeline detected 60% of the accidents. However, on the public TAD benchmark, which also contains normal traffic, its score did not separate accident videos from normal videos (test AUC 0.48), and it raised alarms in 14 of 16 normal videos. Controlled experiments traced this failure mainly to tracking errors and the pixel-based score. We therefore propose a configuration that detects vehicles with YOLOv3, tracks them with ByteTrack, and scores each vehicle by its speed just before it stops suddenly. It raised the test AUC to 0.88 and the F1 score from 0.67 to 0.83. Its ranking performance was statistically indistinguishable from that of a fine-tuned video transformer (AUC 0.84), although it needs no training on accident videos and identifies the vehicle and frame behind each alarm. Because false alarms remain frequent, the method is suited only to pre-screening by human operators.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Bahçeşehir University (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon