Association Between Peak Body Mass Index and Experienced Weight Stigma Among Adults With Obesity

ABSTRACT Background Experienced weight stigma (WS) is associated with negative health and psychosocial outcomes; however, the association of lifetime peak body mass index (BMI) with experienced WS remains unclear. This study examines the association between peak BMI and experienced WS. Methods Cross‐sectional survey data from 794 patients in an academic obesity medicine program were analyzed. Experienced WS was assessed using the Stigmatizing Situations Inventory—Brief and was examined as a continuous variable. Multivariable linear regression analysis performed the association between peak BMI and experienced WS, adjusting for demographics and bariatric surgery (MBS) history. Results Participants (mean age: 56.2 years, 86.3% female) had a mean peak BMI of 44.3 kg/m 2 . More frequent experienced WS was more prevalent in those with peak BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 versus < 40 kg/m 2 (58.5% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, per‐unit increase in peak BMI was associated with a 0.54 experienced WS score increase ( = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.65; p < 0.001). MBS history was associated with increased experienced WS score, while older age and Non‐Hispanic Black were associated with lower WS score. Conclusion Increasing peak BMI is associated with higher experienced WS scores, independent of current BMI. Clinicians should consider weight history to identify at‐risk individuals and inform stigma‐reducing interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Science & Practice
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70202
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Association Between Peak Body Mass Index and Experienced Weight Stigma Among Adults With Obesity

Sarah Elizabeth Messiah, Jeffrey N. Schellinger, Aparajita Chandrasekhar, Sophia Ngenge et al.
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Association Between Peak Body Mass Index and Experienced Weight Stigma Among Adults With Obesity

Sarah Elizabeth Messiah, Jeffrey N. Schellinger, Aparajita Chandrasekhar, Sophia Ngenge, Jaime P. Almandoz, Matthew Sunil Mathew, Matthew Cali, Gloria Lena Vega, Deepali Karina Ernest, Jane Guo, Luyu Xie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Experienced weight stigma (WS) is associated with negative health and psychosocial outcomes; however, the association of lifetime peak body mass index (BMI) with experienced WS remains unclear. This study examines the association between peak BMI and experienced WS. Methods Cross‐sectional survey data from 794 patients in an academic obesity medicine program were analyzed. Experienced WS was assessed using the Stigmatizing Situations Inventory—Brief and was examined as a continuous variable. Multivariable linear regression analysis performed the association between peak BMI and experienced WS, adjusting for demographics and bariatric surgery (MBS) history. Results Participants (mean age: 56.2 years, 86.3% female) had a mean peak BMI of 44.3 kg/m 2 . More frequent experienced WS was more prevalent in those with peak BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 versus < 40 kg/m 2 (58.5% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, per‐unit increase in peak BMI was associated with a 0.54 experienced WS score increase ( = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.65; p < 0.001). MBS history was associated with increased experienced WS score, while older age and Non‐Hispanic Black were associated with lower WS score. Conclusion Increasing peak BMI is associated with higher experienced WS scores, independent of current BMI. Clinicians should consider weight history to identify at‐risk individuals and inform stigma‐reducing interventions.

Obesity Science & PracticeVol. 12(6)
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon