EVALUATING JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD STANDARD

The best interests of the child standard is a cornerstone of international, regional, and domestic child rights law, requiring that a child's welfare be the paramount consideration in all matters affecting them. This study critically examines how South African courts interpret and apply the best interests of the child standard in cases involving custody, adoption, child protection, and other disputes affecting children. It is situated within the broader framework of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, section 28(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and section 9 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005. The study is motivated by the continuing vulnerability of children to poverty, abuse, neglect, inequality, family instability, and other socio-economic challenges that undermine the realisation of their rights. The research adopts a qualitative doctrinal methodology, complemented by a case study analysis of selected South African judgments. Primary legal sources, including constitutional provisions, legislation, international and regional instruments, and judicial decisions, are analysed alongside relevant academic literature. The findings demonstrate that South African courts have played a pivotal role in advancing child-centred jurisprudence by giving substantive effect to the best interests principle. However, the study also finds that the inherently flexible and context-specific nature of the principle may result in inconsistent judicial reasoning and varying outcomes in comparable cases. It argues that the effective protection of children's rights requires not only robust judicial enforcement but also child-sensitive court procedures, enhanced psychosocial support services, continuous judicial training, and stronger institutional coordination. The study contributes to ongoing scholarly debates on strengthening the consistent implementation of the best interests standard and promoting meaningful protection of children's rights within South Africa's constitutional democracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Veredas do Direito Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.8835
Primary Topic
Family and Matrimonial Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

EVALUATING JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD STANDARD

Desiré L. Dalton, Shadung John Moja, Tshedza Mathada-Mathivha, Binyam Yitay
Veredas do Direito Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Family and Matrimonial Law
article

EVALUATING JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD STANDARD

Desiré L. Dalton, Shadung John Moja, Tshedza Mathada-Mathivha, Binyam Yitay
article en

Abstract

The best interests of the child standard is a cornerstone of international, regional, and domestic child rights law, requiring that a child's welfare be the paramount consideration in all matters affecting them. This study critically examines how South African courts interpret and apply the best interests of the child standard in cases involving custody, adoption, child protection, and other disputes affecting children. It is situated within the broader framework of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, section 28(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and section 9 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005. The study is motivated by the continuing vulnerability of children to poverty, abuse, neglect, inequality, family instability, and other socio-economic challenges that undermine the realisation of their rights. The research adopts a qualitative doctrinal methodology, complemented by a case study analysis of selected South African judgments. Primary legal sources, including constitutional provisions, legislation, international and regional instruments, and judicial decisions, are analysed alongside relevant academic literature. The findings demonstrate that South African courts have played a pivotal role in advancing child-centred jurisprudence by giving substantive effect to the best interests principle. However, the study also finds that the inherently flexible and context-specific nature of the principle may result in inconsistent judicial reasoning and varying outcomes in comparable cases. It argues that the effective protection of children's rights requires not only robust judicial enforcement but also child-sensitive court procedures, enhanced psychosocial support services, continuous judicial training, and stronger institutional coordination. The study contributes to ongoing scholarly debates on strengthening the consistent implementation of the best interests standard and promoting meaningful protection of children's rights within South Africa's constitutional democracy.

Veredas do Direito Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento SustentávelVol. 23(17)
Family and Matrimonial Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon