Administrative Discretion in the Context of Automation and Artificial Intelligence

This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence and automated systems on the exercise of discretionary powers by public administrative authorities. It distinguishes bound powers, administrative discretion and judicial discretion, and proposes three dimensions for analysing administrative choice: normative, case-specific and technologically mediated. Drawing on Ukrainian legislation, thirteen publicly available Supreme Court judicial acts in which the author served as judge-rapporteur, and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, the study identifies the conditions under which automation may constrain administrative arbitrariness and the risks of unlawfully narrowing discretion through software architecture. It proposes a seven-part test for judicial review of algorithmically assisted administrative decisions and an amendment to Article 62 of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” concerning the limits of fully automated adoption of administrative acts. The anti-corruption and economic effects of automation are treated as propositions requiring empirical verification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24084505
Primary Topic
Administrative Law and Governance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Administrative Discretion in the Context of Automation and Artificial Intelligence

Я. О. Берназюк
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Administrative Law and Governance
preprint

Administrative Discretion in the Context of Automation and Artificial Intelligence

Я. О. Берназюк
preprint en

Abstract

This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence and automated systems on the exercise of discretionary powers by public administrative authorities. It distinguishes bound powers, administrative discretion and judicial discretion, and proposes three dimensions for analysing administrative choice: normative, case-specific and technologically mediated. Drawing on Ukrainian legislation, thirteen publicly available Supreme Court judicial acts in which the author served as judge-rapporteur, and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, the study identifies the conditions under which automation may constrain administrative arbitrariness and the risks of unlawfully narrowing discretion through software architecture. It proposes a seven-part test for judicial review of algorithmically assisted administrative decisions and an amendment to Article 62 of the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” concerning the limits of fully automated adoption of administrative acts. The anti-corruption and economic effects of automation are treated as propositions requiring empirical verification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Administrative Law and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon