Predatory publishing in radiology: advice for early-career researchers

Abstract Predatory journals typically use practices based on deceit, misleading information, lack of transparency, and the absence of rigorous peer review. Within radiology, such journals frequently publish articles with minimal editorial oversight and limited scientific credibility. The relevance of this issue in radiology has grown as imaging research has expanded rapidly, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI), quantitative imaging, and subspecialty-driven innovation. Given the academic pressure created by the “publish or perish” culture, this environment makes early-career radiologists especially vulnerable to predatory journals that promise rapid publication and high acceptance rates. Predatory journals exploit this environment by sending unsolicited invitations to publish or join editorial boards, frequently using flattering language and promising unrealistic publication timelines. These journals generally lack robust peer review, methodological scrutiny, and transparency and are typically not indexed in established databases such as PubMed, Scopus, or Web of Science. Consequently, articles published in these outlets have reduced visibility, limited citation potential, and minimal impact on radiological science or clinical practice. Furthermore, publication in predatory journals may adversely affect academic reputation and career advancement, as hiring and funding committees increasingly prioritise journal quality and publication integrity. The rapid expansion of radiology research, particularly in diagnostic imaging, interventional radiology, and AI-powered applications, may increase opportunities for the dissemination of low-quality or insufficiently validated evidence through predatory journals. Raising awareness of predatory publishing practices and consistently applying evaluation tools such as the “Think. Check. Submit.” framework, are fundamental to safeguarding scientific integrity and ensuring the dissemination of high-quality radiological research. Key Points Question Predatory publishing is a growing concern in radiology, driven by rising publication pressure and the “publish or perish” culture. Early-career researchers are particularly susceptible to unethical journals that offer rapid publication. Findings Predatory journals frequently bypass rigorous peer review, lack transparency, and are often not indexed in major databases. These journals exploit authors through unsolicited invitations and prioritise profit over scientific quality. Critical relevance statement Avoiding predatory journals is important for protecting research credibility, career progression, and scientific integrity. Publications in these outlets may disseminate unreliable evidence and are often disregarded in academic and clinical evaluations.