The Axiomatic Theory of Global Federated Agentic Coordination, Mandate Portability and Authority-in-the-Loop

Abstract This paper develops an axiomatic and architectural framework for global federated agentic economic coordination under verifiable mandates, legitimate authority, constitutional constraints, and human custodianship. Building upon the ANOA (AI-Native Organizational Architecture) research programme and HomeSelf Research, the study examines how autonomous agents, external large language models, decentralized infrastructures, and sovereign institutional systems may interoperate without transferring or expanding authority beyond legally and technically admissible boundaries. The proposed Unified Federated Mandate Architecture (UFMA) integrates mandate-on-demand, cryptographic authorization, cross-infrastructure portability, federated revocation, deterministic policy enforcement, and Authority-in-the-Loop mechanisms. A specialized internal language-model layer is considered for mandate negotiation, while authorization and execution remain subject to independent verification. The research further examines architectural authority, human custodianship, constitutional guardrails, cybersecurity, and operational resilience under adversarial conditions, including compromised models, stolen credentials, network partitions, concurrent transactions, and cross-jurisdictional conflicts. The paper distinguishes cryptographic authenticity from legal legitimacy, technical interoperability from institutional sovereignty, and automated execution from accountable authority. Its mathematical propositions and architectural safeguards are presented as conditional theoretical results requiring further formal verification and empirical validation. The central proposition is that globally interoperable agentic infrastructures can be designed around distributed execution and coordinated mandates while preserving legitimate institutional authority, human rights, economic stability, and effective mechanisms of oversight and remedy. Research status: Independent theoretical working paper. Version 1.0. Not peer-reviewed. No institutional endorsement or operational certification is claimed. Research programme: ANOA — AI-Native Organizational Architecture; HomeSelf Research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24074870
Primary Topic
Access Control and Trust
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Axiomatic Theory of Global Federated Agentic Coordination, Mandate Portability and Authority-in-the-Loop

Marco Patrone
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Access Control and Trust
article

The Axiomatic Theory of Global Federated Agentic Coordination, Mandate Portability and Authority-in-the-Loop

Marco Patrone
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops an axiomatic and architectural framework for global federated agentic economic coordination under verifiable mandates, legitimate authority, constitutional constraints, and human custodianship. Building upon the ANOA (AI-Native Organizational Architecture) research programme and HomeSelf Research, the study examines how autonomous agents, external large language models, decentralized infrastructures, and sovereign institutional systems may interoperate without transferring or expanding authority beyond legally and technically admissible boundaries. The proposed Unified Federated Mandate Architecture (UFMA) integrates mandate-on-demand, cryptographic authorization, cross-infrastructure portability, federated revocation, deterministic policy enforcement, and Authority-in-the-Loop mechanisms. A specialized internal language-model layer is considered for mandate negotiation, while authorization and execution remain subject to independent verification. The research further examines architectural authority, human custodianship, constitutional guardrails, cybersecurity, and operational resilience under adversarial conditions, including compromised models, stolen credentials, network partitions, concurrent transactions, and cross-jurisdictional conflicts. The paper distinguishes cryptographic authenticity from legal legitimacy, technical interoperability from institutional sovereignty, and automated execution from accountable authority. Its mathematical propositions and architectural safeguards are presented as conditional theoretical results requiring further formal verification and empirical validation. The central proposition is that globally interoperable agentic infrastructures can be designed around distributed execution and coordinated mandates while preserving legitimate institutional authority, human rights, economic stability, and effective mechanisms of oversight and remedy. Research status: Independent theoretical working paper. Version 1.0. Not peer-reviewed. No institutional endorsement or operational certification is claimed. Research programme: ANOA — AI-Native Organizational Architecture; HomeSelf Research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Access Control and Trust
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon