Paired-Pulse TMS as a Window into Cortical Microcircuits: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Challenges

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) generates cortical electrical currents that, when applied to the primary motor cortex, depolarise neurons, producing motor evoked potentials. Rather than selectively interrogating isolated networks, paired-pulse TMS (PP-TMS) paradigms provide sensitivity to different overlapping inhibitory and facilitatory processes. Conventionally, short-interval Intracortical Inhibition has been assumed to reflect fast GABAA receptor-mediated transmission, long-interval intracortical inhibition to rely on slower GABAB receptor mechanisms, and intracortical facilitation on glutamatergic AMPA/NMDA receptor activity. Despite decades of use, clinical translation of these protocols is limited. Interpretation is constrained by reliance on in vivo and pharmacological models, which only partially capture human cortical microcircuitry. Crucially, the precise cellular and synaptic substrates underlying PP-TMS measures remain incompletely understood, limiting mechanistic insight. This review integrates evidence from human and experimental models to dissect neurotransmitter-specific and cellular mechanisms of PP-TMS. We examine these measures from complementary perspectives— postsynaptic receptor pharmacology, presynaptic vesicular and calcium dynamics, non-synaptic axonal excitability, spinal and subcortical integration, neuromodulatory control, and computational modelling—and integrate them within a translational, multi-level framework in which each macroscopic measure is treated as the net result of overlapping excitatory and inhibitory processes rather than the signature of a single cellular substrate. This “overlap” framework is used throughout to judge which cellular mechanisms can, and cannot, plausibly account for human short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical facilitation, and to foreground current gaps, translational limitations, and priorities for clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomolecules
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16111633
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Paired-Pulse TMS as a Window into Cortical Microcircuits: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Challenges

Ricci Hannah, Anna Latorre, João Moura, Pietro Antenucci et al.
Biomolecules
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Paired-Pulse TMS as a Window into Cortical Microcircuits: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Challenges

Ricci Hannah, Anna Latorre, João Moura, Pietro Antenucci, Lorenzo Rocchi, Maria Lucrezia Lavena
article en

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) generates cortical electrical currents that, when applied to the primary motor cortex, depolarise neurons, producing motor evoked potentials. Rather than selectively interrogating isolated networks, paired-pulse TMS (PP-TMS) paradigms provide sensitivity to different overlapping inhibitory and facilitatory processes. Conventionally, short-interval Intracortical Inhibition has been assumed to reflect fast GABAA receptor-mediated transmission, long-interval intracortical inhibition to rely on slower GABAB receptor mechanisms, and intracortical facilitation on glutamatergic AMPA/NMDA receptor activity. Despite decades of use, clinical translation of these protocols is limited. Interpretation is constrained by reliance on in vivo and pharmacological models, which only partially capture human cortical microcircuitry. Crucially, the precise cellular and synaptic substrates underlying PP-TMS measures remain incompletely understood, limiting mechanistic insight. This review integrates evidence from human and experimental models to dissect neurotransmitter-specific and cellular mechanisms of PP-TMS. We examine these measures from complementary perspectives— postsynaptic receptor pharmacology, presynaptic vesicular and calcium dynamics, non-synaptic axonal excitability, spinal and subcortical integration, neuromodulatory control, and computational modelling—and integrate them within a translational, multi-level framework in which each macroscopic measure is treated as the net result of overlapping excitatory and inhibitory processes rather than the signature of a single cellular substrate. This “overlap” framework is used throughout to judge which cellular mechanisms can, and cannot, plausibly account for human short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical facilitation, and to foreground current gaps, translational limitations, and priorities for clinical application.

BiomoleculesVol. 16(11)
University of Cagliari (IT), Universidade do Porto (PT), King's College London (GB), University of Ferrara (IT), Arcispedale Sant'Anna (IT), Hospital de Santo António (PT), Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António EPE (PT), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Albel Salazar (PT), University College London (GB)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon