Representation of North Atlantic Atmospheric Rivers in the IFS and ICON Models: Insights from NAWDIC Dropsonde Observations

Abstract. Atmospheric Rivers (ARs), defined as narrow bands of intense water vapor transport, are a major driver of wintertime heavy precipitation and flood events across Western Europe. Due to the high impacts of ARs, accurate forecasts are crucial, but their initialization and evaluation remains challenging due to a lack of observational data over the oceans. The “North Atlantic Waveguide, Dry Intrusion and Downstream Impact Campaign" (NAWDIC) collected unique dropsonde observations of several strong ARs that caused widespread flooding, disruption and economic damage over the Iberian Peninsula and Northern Africa in January and February 2026. Using this one-of-a-kind dataset, we performed the first systematic evaluation of the AR representation over the North Atlantic ocean basin in the IFS and the ICON models. Specifically, the vertical structure of temperature, specific humidity, horizontal wind speed, and moisture flux magnitude was analyzed using the model data assimilation outputs. While the overall representation of ARs in the IFS and ICON models is skillfull, results indicate large random errors in the horizontal wind speed estimates and a slight cold bias over North Atlantic AR regions. The IFS exhibits an underestimation and large random errors in the humidity, peaking between 700 and 750 hPa, which corresponds to the upper-level extension of ARs. The ICON model tends to slightly underestimate the humidity throughout the boundary layer and the entire lower troposphere up to 650 hPa. The large random errors in wind speed and the underestimation of humidity in both models lead to an underestimated and highly uncertain moisture flux magnitude in the IFS and ICON models. The results of this study highlight the importance of observational data from AR regions over the North Atlantic and the current model limitations in accurately representing intense ARs affecting Western Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6383
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Representation of North Atlantic Atmospheric Rivers in the IFS and ICON Models: Insights from NAWDIC Dropsonde Observations

David A. Lavers, Joaquim Ginete Pinto, Alexandre Miguel Ramos, Magdalena Kracheletz
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
preprint

Representation of North Atlantic Atmospheric Rivers in the IFS and ICON Models: Insights from NAWDIC Dropsonde Observations

David A. Lavers, Joaquim Ginete Pinto, Alexandre Miguel Ramos, Magdalena Kracheletz
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric Rivers (ARs), defined as narrow bands of intense water vapor transport, are a major driver of wintertime heavy precipitation and flood events across Western Europe. Due to the high impacts of ARs, accurate forecasts are crucial, but their initialization and evaluation remains challenging due to a lack of observational data over the oceans. The “North Atlantic Waveguide, Dry Intrusion and Downstream Impact Campaign" (NAWDIC) collected unique dropsonde observations of several strong ARs that caused widespread flooding, disruption and economic damage over the Iberian Peninsula and Northern Africa in January and February 2026. Using this one-of-a-kind dataset, we performed the first systematic evaluation of the AR representation over the North Atlantic ocean basin in the IFS and the ICON models. Specifically, the vertical structure of temperature, specific humidity, horizontal wind speed, and moisture flux magnitude was analyzed using the model data assimilation outputs. While the overall representation of ARs in the IFS and ICON models is skillfull, results indicate large random errors in the horizontal wind speed estimates and a slight cold bias over North Atlantic AR regions. The IFS exhibits an underestimation and large random errors in the humidity, peaking between 700 and 750 hPa, which corresponds to the upper-level extension of ARs. The ICON model tends to slightly underestimate the humidity throughout the boundary layer and the entire lower troposphere up to 650 hPa. The large random errors in wind speed and the underestimation of humidity in both models lead to an underestimated and highly uncertain moisture flux magnitude in the IFS and ICON models. The results of this study highlight the importance of observational data from AR regions over the North Atlantic and the current model limitations in accurately representing intense ARs affecting Western Europe.

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Representation of North Atlantic Atmospheric Rivers in the IFS and ICON Models: Insights from NAWDIC Dropsonde Observations — David A. Lavers, Joaquim Ginete Pinto, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS