External Validation of a Risk Score Assessment for Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Mortality

The ACTION score was internally validated to predict mortality after pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) placement. This study aims to externally validate the ACTION score and compare its performance to the INTERMACS profile for prediction of mortality in pediatric VAD candidates. The publicly available Pedimacs dataset (531 patients) was used for external validation. The Pedimacs dataset as well as a contemporary ACTION dataset (1,304 patients) were used to compare the performance of the ACTION score and INTERMACS profile. A statistically significant linear trend in the proportion of death across increasing ACTION scores (p < 0.0001) was observed in the Pedimacs dataset, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. Both the ACTION score and the INTERMACS profile demonstrated a significant linear trend in the proportion of death across scores in the ACTION dataset. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.71 and 0.58 for the ACTION score and INTERMACS profile, respectively. The ACTION score is externally validated with the Pedimacs dataset and is a fair predictor of mortality. The ACTION score performed better than the INTERMACS profile in predicting mortality using both historical Pedimacs data and contemporary ACTION data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002898
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

External Validation of a Risk Score Assessment for Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Mortality

Katerina A. Boucek, Angela Lorts, David N. Rosenthal, Robert A. Niebler et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

External Validation of a Risk Score Assessment for Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Mortality

Katerina A. Boucek, Angela Lorts, David N. Rosenthal, Robert A. Niebler, Jian Zhang, Ke Yan, Meaghan Reaney
article en

Abstract

The ACTION score was internally validated to predict mortality after pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) placement. This study aims to externally validate the ACTION score and compare its performance to the INTERMACS profile for prediction of mortality in pediatric VAD candidates. The publicly available Pedimacs dataset (531 patients) was used for external validation. The Pedimacs dataset as well as a contemporary ACTION dataset (1,304 patients) were used to compare the performance of the ACTION score and INTERMACS profile. A statistically significant linear trend in the proportion of death across increasing ACTION scores (p < 0.0001) was observed in the Pedimacs dataset, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. Both the ACTION score and the INTERMACS profile demonstrated a significant linear trend in the proportion of death across scores in the ACTION dataset. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.71 and 0.58 for the ACTION score and INTERMACS profile, respectively. The ACTION score is externally validated with the Pedimacs dataset and is a fair predictor of mortality. The ACTION score performed better than the INTERMACS profile in predicting mortality using both historical Pedimacs data and contemporary ACTION data.

ASAIO Journal
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Stanford University (US)
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon