Conceptualizing Responsible AI Governance Structures for Automated Decision Systems in Regulated Industries

Automated decision systems (ADS) are increasingly embedded in the core operations of regulated industries such as banking, insurance, healthcare, and utilities, where their outputs can affect creditworthiness, medical treatment, employment, and access to essential services. This paper conceptualizes a governance structure for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) that regulated organizations can adopt to manage the risks associated with ADS while preserving their capacity to innovate. Drawing on the regulatory landscape that had taken shape by 2023, including the European Union's proposed AI Act, the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology AI Risk Management Framework, sector-specific supervisory guidance in banking and insurance, and long-standing model risk management practice, the paper proposes a sevenlayer governance architecture spanning board oversight, cross-functional coordination, model validation, technical assurance, compliance mapping, independent audit, and stakeholder redress. Each layer is examined in detail, and a worked scenario illustrates the structure applied to a consumer credit model across its full lifecycle. The framework is then applied to six regulated sectors, including energy and telecommunications alongside financial services, healthcare, insurance, and employment, to illustrate how the same structural logic adapts to different statutory obligations and risk profiles. The paper closes with a discussion of practical tensions and crosscutting themes, recommendations with an implementation roadmap, and directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56201/ijssmr.v10.no11.2024.pg.403.430
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Conceptualizing Responsible AI Governance Structures for Automated Decision Systems in Regulated Industries

Michael Ominyi
13 citations
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
8.52
article

Conceptualizing Responsible AI Governance Structures for Automated Decision Systems in Regulated Industries

Michael Ominyi
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Automated decision systems (ADS) are increasingly embedded in the core operations of regulated industries such as banking, insurance, healthcare, and utilities, where their outputs can affect creditworthiness, medical treatment, employment, and access to essential services. This paper conceptualizes a governance structure for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) that regulated organizations can adopt to manage the risks associated with ADS while preserving their capacity to innovate. Drawing on the regulatory landscape that had taken shape by 2023, including the European Union's proposed AI Act, the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology AI Risk Management Framework, sector-specific supervisory guidance in banking and insurance, and long-standing model risk management practice, the paper proposes a sevenlayer governance architecture spanning board oversight, cross-functional coordination, model validation, technical assurance, compliance mapping, independent audit, and stakeholder redress. Each layer is examined in detail, and a worked scenario illustrates the structure applied to a consumer credit model across its full lifecycle. The framework is then applied to six regulated sectors, including energy and telecommunications alongside financial services, healthcare, insurance, and employment, to illustrate how the same structural logic adapts to different statutory obligations and risk profiles. The paper closes with a discussion of practical tensions and crosscutting themes, recommendations with an implementation roadmap, and directions for future research.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Ernst & Young (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon