Trusted Intelligent Sensing for Sport–Medicine Integrated Physical Activity Interventions: A Framework and Research Agenda

Physical inactivity is among the largest modifiable contributors to the global burden of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and several cancers, yet one in three adults worldwide still does not meet minimum activity recommendations (Guthold et al., 2024). Sports promotion and medical care have historically operated as separate systems: the sports sector delivers activity opportunities without clinical follow-up, while the medical sector treats the consequences of inactivity without prescribing exercise as a therapy. “Sport–medicine integration” — the deliberate coupling of physical-activity promotion with clinical and public-health pathways — is now a stated policy goal, but its delivery has been limited by the lack of trustworthy measurement and feedback between the two sectors. This Perspective argues that high-assurance intelligent sensing — wearable inertial and photoplethysmographic sensors, on-device activity recognition, and privacy-preserving data pipelines — is the missing technical layer that can make sport–medicine integration operable. We define six requirements for “high assurance”: clinical-grade accuracy across populations, transparent and human-auditable algorithms, privacy-preserving data handling, fairness across demographic groups, regulatory validity, and a closed-loop feedback path back to both the user and the clinician. We propose a four-layer framework — sensing, assurance, prescription, and feedback — and map the current evidence against it. The field’s priority is not more activity trackers but prospective, population-validated intervention trials in which sensing data drive tailored exercise prescriptions and are evaluated against health outcomes rather than step counts alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64904/20261006
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Trusted Intelligent Sensing for Sport–Medicine Integrated Physical Activity Interventions: A Framework and Research Agenda

Anthony Murphy, Chad Jensen, Liam Morley
Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
article

Trusted Intelligent Sensing for Sport–Medicine Integrated Physical Activity Interventions: A Framework and Research Agenda

Anthony Murphy, Chad Jensen, Liam Morley
article en

Abstract

Physical inactivity is among the largest modifiable contributors to the global burden of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and several cancers, yet one in three adults worldwide still does not meet minimum activity recommendations (Guthold et al., 2024). Sports promotion and medical care have historically operated as separate systems: the sports sector delivers activity opportunities without clinical follow-up, while the medical sector treats the consequences of inactivity without prescribing exercise as a therapy. “Sport–medicine integration” — the deliberate coupling of physical-activity promotion with clinical and public-health pathways — is now a stated policy goal, but its delivery has been limited by the lack of trustworthy measurement and feedback between the two sectors. This Perspective argues that high-assurance intelligent sensing — wearable inertial and photoplethysmographic sensors, on-device activity recognition, and privacy-preserving data pipelines — is the missing technical layer that can make sport–medicine integration operable. We define six requirements for “high assurance”: clinical-grade accuracy across populations, transparent and human-auditable algorithms, privacy-preserving data handling, fairness across demographic groups, regulatory validity, and a closed-loop feedback path back to both the user and the clinician. We propose a four-layer framework — sensing, assurance, prescription, and feedback — and map the current evidence against it. The field’s priority is not more activity trackers but prospective, population-validated intervention trials in which sensing data drive tailored exercise prescriptions and are evaluated against health outcomes rather than step counts alone.

Journal of Public Health and Preventive MedicineVol. 2(10)
University of Alberta (CA)
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon