Evaluation of Reciprocal Relation Between Single and Bundle Fiber Strength of Egyptian Cotton Grades

The four commercial Egyptian cotton varieties (Gossypium barbadense L); Extra-G 92, Extra-G 96, Super-G 97, and Giza 98 were collected from Egyptian gin mills through 2025 season. All cotton varieties were graded into three studied grades, namely; Fully Good (FG), Good (G), and Fully Good Fair (FGF). The study was carried out in Cotton Grading Department, Cotton Research Institute (CRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. Using two different instruments: Fiber Classifying System (FCS); module Fibrotest for measuring bundle strength, and Fanyuan tester for measuring single fiber strength with presence of elongation at break, work to break and force to break for the two instruments. In single fiber strength for 45, 50 and 55 fiber numbers. There were highly statistically differences for all previous cotton properties. It was an obvious trend of the highest values for single fiber properties compared to bundle fiber in strength and elongation. On the contrary, the highest values of work to break and force to break in bundle fiber strength compared to single fibers measurements. Single fiber strength of 50 fiber numbers showed more stable values than others. All measures of association were more than 90% for coefficient of determination and effect sizes criteria. Practically using Fibrotest for measuring cotton bundle fiber strength is relatively quickly unlike Fanyuan tester according to saving time and efforts unlike a single fiber tester. Knowing the difference between the bundle fiber strength and the single fiber strength helps in predicting yarn strength and the expected level of quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Agricultural Science Engineering and Technology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v10i3.8815
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Evaluation of Reciprocal Relation Between Single and Bundle Fiber Strength of Egyptian Cotton Grades

M. Shalaby
American Journal of Agricultural Science Engineering and Technology
Textile materials and evaluations
article

Evaluation of Reciprocal Relation Between Single and Bundle Fiber Strength of Egyptian Cotton Grades

M. Shalaby
article en

Abstract

The four commercial Egyptian cotton varieties (Gossypium barbadense L); Extra-G 92, Extra-G 96, Super-G 97, and Giza 98 were collected from Egyptian gin mills through 2025 season. All cotton varieties were graded into three studied grades, namely; Fully Good (FG), Good (G), and Fully Good Fair (FGF). The study was carried out in Cotton Grading Department, Cotton Research Institute (CRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. Using two different instruments: Fiber Classifying System (FCS); module Fibrotest for measuring bundle strength, and Fanyuan tester for measuring single fiber strength with presence of elongation at break, work to break and force to break for the two instruments. In single fiber strength for 45, 50 and 55 fiber numbers. There were highly statistically differences for all previous cotton properties. It was an obvious trend of the highest values for single fiber properties compared to bundle fiber in strength and elongation. On the contrary, the highest values of work to break and force to break in bundle fiber strength compared to single fibers measurements. Single fiber strength of 50 fiber numbers showed more stable values than others. All measures of association were more than 90% for coefficient of determination and effect sizes criteria. Practically using Fibrotest for measuring cotton bundle fiber strength is relatively quickly unlike Fanyuan tester according to saving time and efforts unlike a single fiber tester. Knowing the difference between the bundle fiber strength and the single fiber strength helps in predicting yarn strength and the expected level of quality.

American Journal of Agricultural Science Engineering and TechnologyVol. 10(3)
Agricultural Research Center (EG)
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon