Sacred choices: how religion shapes economic and environmental preferences in 64 countries

Understanding how religious beliefs influence environmental concern is crucial in a world facing ecological challenges. While existing research often focuses on socio-economic determinants, fewer studies investigate how religion informs environmental priorities. This study explores how religious affiliation and practice shape individuals’ willingness to prioritize environmental protection across Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, and Hinduism, using World Values Survey data (2017–2022). We analyzed data from 64 countries with probit and instrumental variables (IV) probit regression. Religiosity is assessed by self-reported affiliation and frequency of religious service attendance. Average religiosity among similar respondents in countries where the same faith dominates serves as the instrument. Probit model estimates show that being religious positively correlates with prioritizing environmental protection (β = 0.038; p < 0.01), whereas more frequent attendance slightly reduces this likelihood (β = −0.021; p < 0.001). The multilevel probit model was estimated to account for clustering and showed similar results. IV probit estimates confirm religiosity’s overall positive impact (β = 0.169; p < 0.01), especially among Christians (β = 0.329; p < 0.001) and Muslims (β = 0.388; p < 0.001). These results highlight the role of religious identity in shaping environmental concern, although the intensity of practice may moderate its effect.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Religion
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2026.2750749
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Sacred choices: how religion shapes economic and environmental preferences in 64 countries

Rafi Amir‐ud‐Din, Rao Muhammad Atif, Muhammad Fahad Iqbal Khan, Amina Farheen
Journal of Contemporary Religion
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Sacred choices: how religion shapes economic and environmental preferences in 64 countries

Rafi Amir‐ud‐Din, Rao Muhammad Atif, Muhammad Fahad Iqbal Khan, Amina Farheen
article en

Abstract

Understanding how religious beliefs influence environmental concern is crucial in a world facing ecological challenges. While existing research often focuses on socio-economic determinants, fewer studies investigate how religion informs environmental priorities. This study explores how religious affiliation and practice shape individuals’ willingness to prioritize environmental protection across Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, and Hinduism, using World Values Survey data (2017–2022). We analyzed data from 64 countries with probit and instrumental variables (IV) probit regression. Religiosity is assessed by self-reported affiliation and frequency of religious service attendance. Average religiosity among similar respondents in countries where the same faith dominates serves as the instrument. Probit model estimates show that being religious positively correlates with prioritizing environmental protection (β = 0.038; p < 0.01), whereas more frequent attendance slightly reduces this likelihood (β = −0.021; p < 0.001). The multilevel probit model was estimated to account for clustering and showed similar results. IV probit estimates confirm religiosity’s overall positive impact (β = 0.169; p < 0.01), especially among Christians (β = 0.329; p < 0.001) and Muslims (β = 0.388; p < 0.001). These results highlight the role of religious identity in shaping environmental concern, although the intensity of practice may moderate its effect.

Journal of Contemporary Religion
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon