Nuclear Momentum Transfer in Invisible-Dark-Boson Searches at the Electron–Ion Collider

We quantify the benefit of nuclear momentum-transfer information in invisible-dark-boson searches at the Electron–Ion Collider. We compare optimized rectangular cuts, an estimated likelihood selection, and boosted decision trees (BDTs) for coherent scalar and vector production in electron–gold collisions at 18 GeV by 100 GeV per nucleon. Each method uses electron-only inputs or adds t, the positive magnitude of the squared nuclear four-momentum transfer. The generator-level comparison uses common weighted samples, preselection, and a significance objective, with ten independent runs at 11 masses for each boson type. At 10 GeV, adding t improves significance by approximately 31–39% across the three methods. With t included in all methods, BDT and likelihood selections give approximately 3% further improvement over cuts and have similar performance. At this mass, the benefit of t persists under illustrative 10% and 20% relative smearing and the tested photon-loss variations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Particles
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/particles9040105
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Nuclear Momentum Transfer in Invisible-Dark-Boson Searches at the Electron–Ion Collider

Rojae Mighty, Ankush Reddy Kanuganti
Particles
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Nuclear Momentum Transfer in Invisible-Dark-Boson Searches at the Electron–Ion Collider

Rojae Mighty, Ankush Reddy Kanuganti
article en

Abstract

We quantify the benefit of nuclear momentum-transfer information in invisible-dark-boson searches at the Electron–Ion Collider. We compare optimized rectangular cuts, an estimated likelihood selection, and boosted decision trees (BDTs) for coherent scalar and vector production in electron–gold collisions at 18 GeV by 100 GeV per nucleon. Each method uses electron-only inputs or adds t, the positive magnitude of the squared nuclear four-momentum transfer. The generator-level comparison uses common weighted samples, preselection, and a significance objective, with ten independent runs at 11 masses for each boson type. At 10 GeV, adding t improves significance by approximately 31–39% across the three methods. With t included in all methods, BDT and likelihood selections give approximately 3% further improvement over cuts and have similar performance. At this mass, the benefit of t persists under illustrative 10% and 20% relative smearing and the tested photon-loss variations.

ParticlesVol. 9(4)
Brookhaven National Laboratory (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon