Governance preferences for urban sustainability transformations in two European neighbourhoods

Abstract Urban sustainability transformations (UST) are claimed as necessary solutions to intertwined ecological, social and economic challenges related to the ”business-as-usual” urban development – including increased greenhouse gas emissions, decreased biodiversity and deepened social inequality. However, it is unclear how different types of governance modes bring the UST forward and whether understandings between stakeholders differ in what this should and could entail. We study how stakeholders perceive ideal governance and frame the envisioned process of UST in game-assisted negotiations, considering infrastructural changes in two urban neighbourhoods in Finland and Switzerland. Three frames emerge in our results: eco-progressive, adaptive, and competitive UST governance. The findings of this study propose that stakeholder preferences for governance may be related to their expectations of UST at the neighbourhood level. The results point towards strong leadership, a novel type of flexibility, and market involvement as potential factors in advancing the governance of UST in the case areas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SN Social Sciences
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-026-01934-3
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Governance preferences for urban sustainability transformations in two European neighbourhoods

Sirkku K. Juhola, Janina Käyhkö, Eveliina Dunkel
SN Social Sciences
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Governance preferences for urban sustainability transformations in two European neighbourhoods

Sirkku K. Juhola, Janina Käyhkö, Eveliina Dunkel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Urban sustainability transformations (UST) are claimed as necessary solutions to intertwined ecological, social and economic challenges related to the ”business-as-usual” urban development – including increased greenhouse gas emissions, decreased biodiversity and deepened social inequality. However, it is unclear how different types of governance modes bring the UST forward and whether understandings between stakeholders differ in what this should and could entail. We study how stakeholders perceive ideal governance and frame the envisioned process of UST in game-assisted negotiations, considering infrastructural changes in two urban neighbourhoods in Finland and Switzerland. Three frames emerge in our results: eco-progressive, adaptive, and competitive UST governance. The findings of this study propose that stakeholder preferences for governance may be related to their expectations of UST at the neighbourhood level. The results point towards strong leadership, a novel type of flexibility, and market involvement as potential factors in advancing the governance of UST in the case areas.

SN Social SciencesVol. 6(11)
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon