Ore Competence, Mineral Texture and Feed Variability: Screening Criteria for HPGR Applicability

High-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) are evaluated as a potential energy-efficient comminution option, but ore competence indices alone cannot establish their suitability across variable geological domains. This critical narrative review organizes a supplied, non-systematically assembled bibliography of 131 records around ore texture, confined-bed response, feed conditioning, representative sampling, circuit boundaries, and industrial transferability. The contribution is a proposed FEL-1 decision framework combining a staged evidence-gated workflow, a qualitative feed-sensitivity matrix, a source-traceability register, and a risk envelope that distinguishes tested from untested feed conditions. Published examples with identifiable methodological detail are differentiated from metadata-only bibliographic context and author-proposed engineering criteria. No new experiments, pooled performance estimates, universal acceptance thresholds, or validated prediction of plant performance are reported. The framework is intended to make outstanding risks and evidence requirements explicit before circuit selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nexus Science Review
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66104/sg9krs33
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Ore Competence, Mineral Texture and Feed Variability: Screening Criteria for HPGR Applicability

Antônio Clareti Pereira
Nexus Science Review
Mineral Processing and Grinding
article

Ore Competence, Mineral Texture and Feed Variability: Screening Criteria for HPGR Applicability

Antônio Clareti Pereira
article en

Abstract

High-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) are evaluated as a potential energy-efficient comminution option, but ore competence indices alone cannot establish their suitability across variable geological domains. This critical narrative review organizes a supplied, non-systematically assembled bibliography of 131 records around ore texture, confined-bed response, feed conditioning, representative sampling, circuit boundaries, and industrial transferability. The contribution is a proposed FEL-1 decision framework combining a staged evidence-gated workflow, a qualitative feed-sensitivity matrix, a source-traceability register, and a risk envelope that distinguishes tested from untested feed conditions. Published examples with identifiable methodological detail are differentiated from metadata-only bibliographic context and author-proposed engineering criteria. No new experiments, pooled performance estimates, universal acceptance thresholds, or validated prediction of plant performance are reported. The framework is intended to make outstanding risks and evidence requirements explicit before circuit selection.

Nexus Science ReviewVol. 1(06 - November)
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR)
Mineral Processing and Grinding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon