Self-Actualization in the Capitalist Work Place: A Case Study in Appropriation

Capitalism, defined as unlimited capital accumulation, is and remains a contested system. In its search for growth and expansion, it succeeds in encapsulating and capitalizing on ever more areas of life, not only in the physical world, but also in the world of ideas and concepts. Variously called appropriation, incorporation, or co-optation, it refers to how expressions of protest, revolution, and dissent are domesticated and deradicalized so as to conform to the purpose of the corporation. In this paper, I discuss the appropriation of the concept of self-actualization, as developed by Abraham Maslow. Holding out the promise of a decentralized, nonhierarchical, and nonauthoritarian work place, it became central to the “human relations” school in management in the 1950s and 1960s. However, in subsequent translations by mainstream scholars, self-actualization became sanitized of its original humanist connotations. It was turned into a “pyramid,” a management tool for production and performance, and into the figure of the economic “entrepreneur of the self,” totally contravening Maslow’s original intentions with self-actualization at work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678261504073
Primary Topic
Human Behavior and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Self-Actualization in the Capitalist Work Place: A Case Study in Appropriation

Max Visser
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Human Behavior and Motivation
article

Self-Actualization in the Capitalist Work Place: A Case Study in Appropriation

Max Visser
article en

Abstract

Capitalism, defined as unlimited capital accumulation, is and remains a contested system. In its search for growth and expansion, it succeeds in encapsulating and capitalizing on ever more areas of life, not only in the physical world, but also in the world of ideas and concepts. Variously called appropriation, incorporation, or co-optation, it refers to how expressions of protest, revolution, and dissent are domesticated and deradicalized so as to conform to the purpose of the corporation. In this paper, I discuss the appropriation of the concept of self-actualization, as developed by Abraham Maslow. Holding out the promise of a decentralized, nonhierarchical, and nonauthoritarian work place, it became central to the “human relations” school in management in the 1950s and 1960s. However, in subsequent translations by mainstream scholars, self-actualization became sanitized of its original humanist connotations. It was turned into a “pyramid,” a management tool for production and performance, and into the figure of the economic “entrepreneur of the self,” totally contravening Maslow’s original intentions with self-actualization at work.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Human Behavior and Motivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon