DFE-Net: Dual-Stream Gated Cross-Modulation and Spatial-Frequency Detail Compensation for Steel Surface Defect Detection

Surface defects on hot-rolled steel strips are often low in contrast, resemble the background, and co-occur. This paper presents DFE-Net, a refinement of YOLO11n for steel surface defect detection. A defect-aware dual-stream gated cross-modulation module (DA-GCM), derived from the FCM block, lets a semantic stream and an appearance stream modulate each other through a dual-pooling channel attention and a multiscale strip spatial attention and combines them with a pixel-wise gate. A spatial-frequency detail-compensation pyramid (SFDP) injects space-to-depth P2 features into the P3 fusion node, refines them with an FFT-based large-kernel block, and aggregates the inputs of every node with an adopted Global Modulated Fusion (GMF) module. A shared-stem parameter-efficient detection head (SSP-Head) shares a grouped-convolution stem between regression and classification. On NEU-DET, over five paired seeds, DFE-Net reaches 74.27 ± 0.81% [email protected] and 41.83 ± 0.55% [email protected]:0.95 with 2.24 M parameters, 0.91 and 0.58 points above YOLO11n; the 95% confidence intervals include zero, although [email protected]:0.95 is higher in all five seeds and in all five folds of a cross-validation, a consistent direction that tests corrected for the overlap of the cross-validation training sets do not confirm. DFE-Net is significantly more accurate than YOLOv8n and YOLO26n but on par with YOLOv9t. It has 13.2% fewer parameters than YOLO11n, but its computation rises from 6.3 to 7.4 GFLOPs and its batch-1 latency from 5.63 to 14.31 ms on a desktop GPU and from 10.15 to 28.73 ms on a Jetson Orin Nano. DFE-Net is thus a compact detector with a modest accuracy gain; its robustness and suitability for online inspection require further validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15215196
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

DFE-Net: Dual-Stream Gated Cross-Modulation and Spatial-Frequency Detail Compensation for Steel Surface Defect Detection

Zhipeng Xue, Weibin Cai, Mingshang Shi, Jing Zhao
Electronics
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

DFE-Net: Dual-Stream Gated Cross-Modulation and Spatial-Frequency Detail Compensation for Steel Surface Defect Detection

Zhipeng Xue, Weibin Cai, Mingshang Shi, Jing Zhao
article en

Abstract

Surface defects on hot-rolled steel strips are often low in contrast, resemble the background, and co-occur. This paper presents DFE-Net, a refinement of YOLO11n for steel surface defect detection. A defect-aware dual-stream gated cross-modulation module (DA-GCM), derived from the FCM block, lets a semantic stream and an appearance stream modulate each other through a dual-pooling channel attention and a multiscale strip spatial attention and combines them with a pixel-wise gate. A spatial-frequency detail-compensation pyramid (SFDP) injects space-to-depth P2 features into the P3 fusion node, refines them with an FFT-based large-kernel block, and aggregates the inputs of every node with an adopted Global Modulated Fusion (GMF) module. A shared-stem parameter-efficient detection head (SSP-Head) shares a grouped-convolution stem between regression and classification. On NEU-DET, over five paired seeds, DFE-Net reaches 74.27 ± 0.81% [email protected] and 41.83 ± 0.55% [email protected]:0.95 with 2.24 M parameters, 0.91 and 0.58 points above YOLO11n; the 95% confidence intervals include zero, although [email protected]:0.95 is higher in all five seeds and in all five folds of a cross-validation, a consistent direction that tests corrected for the overlap of the cross-validation training sets do not confirm. DFE-Net is significantly more accurate than YOLOv8n and YOLO26n but on par with YOLOv9t. It has 13.2% fewer parameters than YOLO11n, but its computation rises from 6.3 to 7.4 GFLOPs and its batch-1 latency from 5.63 to 14.31 ms on a desktop GPU and from 10.15 to 28.73 ms on a Jetson Orin Nano. DFE-Net is thus a compact detector with a modest accuracy gain; its robustness and suitability for online inspection require further validation.

ElectronicsVol. 15(21)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Xijing University (CN)
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon