Justice-Based Reconstruction of the Geographical Indication Protection System for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Ciamis Regency

This study examines the institutional and regulatory barriers preventing the effective protection of Geographical Indications (GIs) for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Ciamis Regency, Indonesia, and develops a justice-based reconstruction model. Despite the region's distinctive products, including Galendo and Mount Sawal coffee, their potential has not been translated into effective collective legal protection or equitable economic benefits. Employing normative-empirical legal research, this study combines an analysis of Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications with semi-structured interviews involving eight purposively selected informants from government agencies and MSME communities. The findings reveal that ineffective GI protection stems primarily from an implementation gap rather than the absence of eligible products. The main barriers comprise unfulfilled regional government obligations, the absence of a representative Geographical Indication Protection Society (MPIG), inadequate intellectual property literacy, and limited institutional coordination. These factors interact and hinder collective action, leaving local product reputations vulnerable to misappropriation. The principal novelty of this study lies in developing a justice-based reconstruction model that translates distributive, participatory, and restorative justice into operational governance criteria, linking specific regulatory and institutional deficiencies to five interconnected reform pillars. The model advances GI protection beyond administrative registration towards inclusive governance of communal intellectual property, with particular emphasis on institutional accountability, community participation, quality assurance, and equitable benefit-sharing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ius Constituendum
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v12i1.15353
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Justice-Based Reconstruction of the Geographical Indication Protection System for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Ciamis Regency

Yeti Sumiyati, Alis Yulia, Neni Sri Imaniyati
Jurnal Ius Constituendum
Intellectual Property Law
article

Justice-Based Reconstruction of the Geographical Indication Protection System for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Ciamis Regency

Yeti Sumiyati, Alis Yulia, Neni Sri Imaniyati
article en

Abstract

This study examines the institutional and regulatory barriers preventing the effective protection of Geographical Indications (GIs) for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Ciamis Regency, Indonesia, and develops a justice-based reconstruction model. Despite the region's distinctive products, including Galendo and Mount Sawal coffee, their potential has not been translated into effective collective legal protection or equitable economic benefits. Employing normative-empirical legal research, this study combines an analysis of Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications with semi-structured interviews involving eight purposively selected informants from government agencies and MSME communities. The findings reveal that ineffective GI protection stems primarily from an implementation gap rather than the absence of eligible products. The main barriers comprise unfulfilled regional government obligations, the absence of a representative Geographical Indication Protection Society (MPIG), inadequate intellectual property literacy, and limited institutional coordination. These factors interact and hinder collective action, leaving local product reputations vulnerable to misappropriation. The principal novelty of this study lies in developing a justice-based reconstruction model that translates distributive, participatory, and restorative justice into operational governance criteria, linking specific regulatory and institutional deficiencies to five interconnected reform pillars. The model advances GI protection beyond administrative registration towards inclusive governance of communal intellectual property, with particular emphasis on institutional accountability, community participation, quality assurance, and equitable benefit-sharing.

Jurnal Ius Constituendum
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon