Graph-Based Adaptive Fusion Network for Multi-Horizon Cryptocurrency Price Forecasting

This study presents a Graph-Based Adaptive Fusion Network (GAFN) for forecasting the closing prices of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and XRP at 7-, 14-, and 30-day horizons. GAFN combines a BiLSTM encoder, a graph attention network constructed from training-period return correlations, and target-conditioned adaptive fusion. It predicts standardized future log returns as intermediate outputs, which are converted to closing-price forecasts for evaluation. The experiments used 3131 aligned daily observations from Yahoo Finance covering 9 November 2017 to 5 June 2026. The data were divided chronologically into training, validation, and confirmatory test partitions. The final 156 observations, covering 1 January to 5 June 2026, yielded 97 forecast origins after sequence generation. Feature and target standardization and graph construction used the training partition only; model selection and residual scaling used the validation partition. GAFN was compared with Persistence, recurrent, fusion, attention-based, and graph-based models using asset-level NRMSE and an unweighted macro-average across the four assets. Each trainable model was evaluated over five random seeds. Several simpler models achieved lower macro-averaged NRMSE than GAFN at 7 days. At 14 days, GAFN tied with LSTM at the reported precision. At the 30-day horizon, GAFN achieved a macro-averaged test NRMSE of 0.03997 ± 0.00019, compared with 0.03979 for Persistence and 0.04062 for Concatenation Fusion. GAFN had the lowest mean NRMSE among the trainable models at this horizon, but the observed differences were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The ablation results also showed no consistent improvement from any individual component across all three horizons. GAFN was therefore competitive in this experiment, but the results do not establish superiority beyond the tested assets and period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14214099
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Graph-Based Adaptive Fusion Network for Multi-Horizon Cryptocurrency Price Forecasting

Jantima Polpinij, Theeraya Uttha, Bungon Kumphon, Woraphot Watthusin et al.
Mathematics
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Graph-Based Adaptive Fusion Network for Multi-Horizon Cryptocurrency Price Forecasting

Jantima Polpinij, Theeraya Uttha, Bungon Kumphon, Woraphot Watthusin, Anirut Chotthanom, Panu Tansorajprasert
article en

Abstract

This study presents a Graph-Based Adaptive Fusion Network (GAFN) for forecasting the closing prices of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and XRP at 7-, 14-, and 30-day horizons. GAFN combines a BiLSTM encoder, a graph attention network constructed from training-period return correlations, and target-conditioned adaptive fusion. It predicts standardized future log returns as intermediate outputs, which are converted to closing-price forecasts for evaluation. The experiments used 3131 aligned daily observations from Yahoo Finance covering 9 November 2017 to 5 June 2026. The data were divided chronologically into training, validation, and confirmatory test partitions. The final 156 observations, covering 1 January to 5 June 2026, yielded 97 forecast origins after sequence generation. Feature and target standardization and graph construction used the training partition only; model selection and residual scaling used the validation partition. GAFN was compared with Persistence, recurrent, fusion, attention-based, and graph-based models using asset-level NRMSE and an unweighted macro-average across the four assets. Each trainable model was evaluated over five random seeds. Several simpler models achieved lower macro-averaged NRMSE than GAFN at 7 days. At 14 days, GAFN tied with LSTM at the reported precision. At the 30-day horizon, GAFN achieved a macro-averaged test NRMSE of 0.03997 ± 0.00019, compared with 0.03979 for Persistence and 0.04062 for Concatenation Fusion. GAFN had the lowest mean NRMSE among the trainable models at this horizon, but the observed differences were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The ablation results also showed no consistent improvement from any individual component across all three horizons. GAFN was therefore competitive in this experiment, but the results do not establish superiority beyond the tested assets and period.

MathematicsVol. 14(21)
Mahasarakham University (TH)
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon