Bio-efficacy and Economics of Newer Insecticides against Mustard Aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on Indian Mustard

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2024–25 at R.B.S. College, Bichpuri, Agra (Uttar Pradesh), to evaluate the bio-efficacy of seven newer insecticides, viz., imidacloprid 17.8 SL, thiamethoxam 25 WG, acephate 75 SP, acetamiprid 20 SP, dimethoate 30 EC, diafenthiuron 50 WP and fipronil 5 SC, against the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design with three replications. A single foliar spray was applied on 18 January 2025 following sufficient pest population build-up. Among the treatments, imidacloprid 17.8 SL recorded the highest mean population reduction (93.97%), followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG (86.35%) and dimethoate 30 EC (83.71%). Conversely, fipronil 5 SC (61.79%), acephate 75 SP (66.14%) and diafenthiuron 50 WP (69.05%) proved the least effective. In terms of productivity and economics, imidacloprid 17.8 SL recorded the highest seed yield (39.49 q ha⁻¹), zero avoidable yield loss, the highest net returns (₹1,91,448 ha⁻¹), and a benefit–cost (B:C) ratio of 6.04:1, followed closely by thiamethoxam 25 WG and dimethoate 30 EC. In comparison, the untreated control registered the lowest seed yield (25.33 q ha⁻¹) and B:C ratio (3.56:1). Overall, imidacloprid 17.8 SL and thiamethoxam 25 WG emerged as the most effective and economically viable interventions for the management of L. erysimi in mustard under integrated pest management (IPM) programmes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i114712
Primary Topic
Insect Pest Control Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Bio-efficacy and Economics of Newer Insecticides against Mustard Aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on Indian Mustard

Anjali Yadav, Abhi Paliwal, Bhawna, Sangita Kumari Kumawat et al.
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Insect Pest Control Strategies
article

Bio-efficacy and Economics of Newer Insecticides against Mustard Aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on Indian Mustard

Anjali Yadav, Abhi Paliwal, Bhawna, Sangita Kumari Kumawat, Sangeeta Srivastava, Kratika Srivastava
article en

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2024–25 at R.B.S. College, Bichpuri, Agra (Uttar Pradesh), to evaluate the bio-efficacy of seven newer insecticides, viz., imidacloprid 17.8 SL, thiamethoxam 25 WG, acephate 75 SP, acetamiprid 20 SP, dimethoate 30 EC, diafenthiuron 50 WP and fipronil 5 SC, against the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design with three replications. A single foliar spray was applied on 18 January 2025 following sufficient pest population build-up. Among the treatments, imidacloprid 17.8 SL recorded the highest mean population reduction (93.97%), followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG (86.35%) and dimethoate 30 EC (83.71%). Conversely, fipronil 5 SC (61.79%), acephate 75 SP (66.14%) and diafenthiuron 50 WP (69.05%) proved the least effective. In terms of productivity and economics, imidacloprid 17.8 SL recorded the highest seed yield (39.49 q ha⁻¹), zero avoidable yield loss, the highest net returns (₹1,91,448 ha⁻¹), and a benefit–cost (B:C) ratio of 6.04:1, followed closely by thiamethoxam 25 WG and dimethoate 30 EC. In comparison, the untreated control registered the lowest seed yield (25.33 q ha⁻¹) and B:C ratio (3.56:1). Overall, imidacloprid 17.8 SL and thiamethoxam 25 WG emerged as the most effective and economically viable interventions for the management of L. erysimi in mustard under integrated pest management (IPM) programmes.

Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsVol. 32(11)
Raja Balwant Singh College (IN), St. John's College, Agra (IN)
Insect Pest Control Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon