AI Risks, Human AI Agency, and Democratic Governance of AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a general-purpose technology with transformative implications across societal sectors. This working paper examines AI at four interconnected levels: societal risks, democratic implications, human learning and agency, and democratic governance. The central question concerns what AI means for human agency and judgement and for society's capacity for democratic governance. The working paper introduces the concept human AI agency, defined as individual’s capacity to engage with AI-systems critically, reflectively, and responsible while retaining human judgement. It further explores democratic AI governance. Citizens require human AI agency to participate in democratic decision-making regarding technological development, while democratic governance provides the conditions necessary for human AI agency to flourish. The working paper concludes that the future social effects of AI will depend on strengthening both human judgement and institutions capable of guiding the development of AI based on democratic principles. The overall argument draws on Giddens' theory of structuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24079725
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

AI Risks, Human AI Agency, and Democratic Governance of AI

Anders Siig Andersen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Risks, Human AI Agency, and Democratic Governance of AI

Anders Siig Andersen
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a general-purpose technology with transformative implications across societal sectors. This working paper examines AI at four interconnected levels: societal risks, democratic implications, human learning and agency, and democratic governance. The central question concerns what AI means for human agency and judgement and for society's capacity for democratic governance. The working paper introduces the concept human AI agency, defined as individual’s capacity to engage with AI-systems critically, reflectively, and responsible while retaining human judgement. It further explores democratic AI governance. Citizens require human AI agency to participate in democratic decision-making regarding technological development, while democratic governance provides the conditions necessary for human AI agency to flourish. The working paper concludes that the future social effects of AI will depend on strengthening both human judgement and institutions capable of guiding the development of AI based on democratic principles. The overall argument draws on Giddens' theory of structuration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Roskilde University (DK)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon