‘Entering a Forbidden Territory’: Co-Creation of Assessment Marking Criteria

Advancements in active learning methods necessitate transparent and continuous dialogue between learners and educators to align and reconcile differing expectations. This study investigates the co-creation of assessment marking criteria in higher education, emphasising the pedagogical value of involving learners in collaboratively designing rubrics with teachers. The research explores how co-creation fosters student engagement, critical thinking, and shared ownership of valuable active learning opportunities. Conducted following a postgraduate module, the study analysed learners’ experiences of co-creating a marking rubric and employed a qualitative methodology involving module evaluations, focus groups, and interviews with participating learners. Four key themes emerged from the data on student perceptions of co-creating a marking rubric in that they: provided novel learning experiences, enhanced agency and creativity, strengthened the sense of community, and improved clarity of assessment expectations for authentic assessment. Benefits and challenges in rubric co-design and implementation are discussed within each of these themes. Findings reveal that 82% of participating learners reported a greater understanding of assessment criteria, with several describing the co-creation process as transformative and one likening the experience to ‘entering a forbidden territory’. The collaborative development of the rubric promoted inclusivity, deepened assessment literacy, and enhanced learners’ confidence and motivation. Findings also suggest that the experience of co-creating the marking rubric may have contributed to higher student achievement in the associated summative assessment task. The research demonstrates that co-creating assessment rubrics can not only enhance academic performance but also build a more inclusive, student-centred educational environment. These findings support broader implementation of co-creation practices as a means to enrich active learning and foster collaborative academic communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Active Learning in Higher Education
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874261500709
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

‘Entering a Forbidden Territory’: Co-Creation of Assessment Marking Criteria

Zeinab Smillie, Tanya Lubicz-Nawrocka, Dean Smith, Ellie Prentice et al.
Active Learning in Higher Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

‘Entering a Forbidden Territory’: Co-Creation of Assessment Marking Criteria

Zeinab Smillie, Tanya Lubicz-Nawrocka, Dean Smith, Ellie Prentice, Jennifer Wright
article en

Abstract

Advancements in active learning methods necessitate transparent and continuous dialogue between learners and educators to align and reconcile differing expectations. This study investigates the co-creation of assessment marking criteria in higher education, emphasising the pedagogical value of involving learners in collaboratively designing rubrics with teachers. The research explores how co-creation fosters student engagement, critical thinking, and shared ownership of valuable active learning opportunities. Conducted following a postgraduate module, the study analysed learners’ experiences of co-creating a marking rubric and employed a qualitative methodology involving module evaluations, focus groups, and interviews with participating learners. Four key themes emerged from the data on student perceptions of co-creating a marking rubric in that they: provided novel learning experiences, enhanced agency and creativity, strengthened the sense of community, and improved clarity of assessment expectations for authentic assessment. Benefits and challenges in rubric co-design and implementation are discussed within each of these themes. Findings reveal that 82% of participating learners reported a greater understanding of assessment criteria, with several describing the co-creation process as transformative and one likening the experience to ‘entering a forbidden territory’. The collaborative development of the rubric promoted inclusivity, deepened assessment literacy, and enhanced learners’ confidence and motivation. Findings also suggest that the experience of co-creating the marking rubric may have contributed to higher student achievement in the associated summative assessment task. The research demonstrates that co-creating assessment rubrics can not only enhance academic performance but also build a more inclusive, student-centred educational environment. These findings support broader implementation of co-creation practices as a means to enrich active learning and foster collaborative academic communities.

Active Learning in Higher Education
University of Stirling (GB), Buckinghamshire New University (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Cornwall College (GB)
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon