Response–durability phenotypes and clinical benefit with erdafitinib: a THOR trial post hoc analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether response durability refines the clinical interpretation of objective response (OR) to erdafitinib in patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This post hoc exploratory analysis used de-identified individual participant-level data from THOR trial Cohort 1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03390504) The safety population included 247 patients treated with erdafitinib (n = 135) or chemotherapy (n = 112). Response-durability phenotypes were defined by integrating best overall response with a 6-month progression-free survival threshold: durable OR, durable disease control, non-durable OR, and limited benefit. Phenotype distributions were compared between treatment arms. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses, including 6-month landmark analyses to reduce guarantee-time bias. RESULTS: Erdafitinib shifted patients toward more favourable response-durability phenotypes compared with chemotherapy. Limited benefit was less frequent with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (45.9% vs 75.9%; P < 0.001), whereas OR phenotypes were more common. In erdafitinib-treated patients, 6-month landmark OS differed significantly across phenotypes (P < 0.001). Durable benefit was associated with longer landmark OS than non-durable benefit (non-durable vs durable benefit: hazard ratio [HR] 4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-7.49). Among objective responders, non-durable OR was associated with substantially worse landmark OS than durable OR (HR 8.71, 95% CI 3.30-22.96). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with erdafitinib, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) OR alone did not fully capture clinically meaningful benefit. Incorporating response durability provided stronger survival stratification and may improve the interpretation of treatment benefit after FGFR-targeted therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70533
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Response–durability phenotypes and clinical benefit with erdafitinib: a THOR trial post hoc analysis

Hiroaki Iwamoto, Takahiro Nohara, Taiki Kamijima, Tomohiro Hori et al.
British Journal of Urology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Response–durability phenotypes and clinical benefit with erdafitinib: a THOR trial post hoc analysis

Hiroaki Iwamoto, Takahiro Nohara, Taiki Kamijima, Tomohiro Hori, Atsushi Mizokami, Hiroshi Yaegashi, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Ryunosuke Nakagawa, Kouji Izumi, Suguru Kadomoto, Tomoyuki Makino, Renato Naito
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether response durability refines the clinical interpretation of objective response (OR) to erdafitinib in patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This post hoc exploratory analysis used de-identified individual participant-level data from THOR trial Cohort 1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03390504) The safety population included 247 patients treated with erdafitinib (n = 135) or chemotherapy (n = 112). Response-durability phenotypes were defined by integrating best overall response with a 6-month progression-free survival threshold: durable OR, durable disease control, non-durable OR, and limited benefit. Phenotype distributions were compared between treatment arms. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses, including 6-month landmark analyses to reduce guarantee-time bias. RESULTS: Erdafitinib shifted patients toward more favourable response-durability phenotypes compared with chemotherapy. Limited benefit was less frequent with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (45.9% vs 75.9%; P < 0.001), whereas OR phenotypes were more common. In erdafitinib-treated patients, 6-month landmark OS differed significantly across phenotypes (P < 0.001). Durable benefit was associated with longer landmark OS than non-durable benefit (non-durable vs durable benefit: hazard ratio [HR] 4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-7.49). Among objective responders, non-durable OR was associated with substantially worse landmark OS than durable OR (HR 8.71, 95% CI 3.30-22.96). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with erdafitinib, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) OR alone did not fully capture clinically meaningful benefit. Incorporating response durability provided stronger survival stratification and may improve the interpretation of treatment benefit after FGFR-targeted therapy.

British Journal of Urology
Kanazawa University (JP)
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon