A taste for what should not be wanted: generative AI and transgressive fantasy

Abstract With generative AI, everyone can materialize whatever fantasy they can conjure​ up in their imagination, including transgressive ones. The ‘orthodox’ view on the moral status of fantasies, even of materialized ones, is that such content is outside the scope of morality, since fantasies are quarantined from the agent’s real-world beliefs and desires. In this paper, we challenge this view by arguing that even if we grant that that is the case, repeated engagement with fantasies can contribute to the cultivation of various affective dispositions, or tastes, that can themselves be morally criticizable. We then argue that generative AI allows users to enter a ‘co-creative feedback loop’, a near-instantaneous cycle of prompting, viewing, and refining one’s fantasy, which makes sustained engagement with the transgressive representations very easy. Our claim is that such repeated and focused engagement with transgressive content can contribute to the cultivation of a taste or sensibility for what is morally problematic in those fantasies. If such tastes are morally criticizable, then engaging in practices that cultivate them is also open to moral criticism, even when no one is directly harmed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-026-09929-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A taste for what should not be wanted: generative AI and transgressive fantasy

Constantin Vică, Cristina Voinea
Ethics and Information Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A taste for what should not be wanted: generative AI and transgressive fantasy

Constantin Vică, Cristina Voinea
article en

Abstract

Abstract With generative AI, everyone can materialize whatever fantasy they can conjure​ up in their imagination, including transgressive ones. The ‘orthodox’ view on the moral status of fantasies, even of materialized ones, is that such content is outside the scope of morality, since fantasies are quarantined from the agent’s real-world beliefs and desires. In this paper, we challenge this view by arguing that even if we grant that that is the case, repeated engagement with fantasies can contribute to the cultivation of various affective dispositions, or tastes, that can themselves be morally criticizable. We then argue that generative AI allows users to enter a ‘co-creative feedback loop’, a near-instantaneous cycle of prompting, viewing, and refining one’s fantasy, which makes sustained engagement with the transgressive representations very easy. Our claim is that such repeated and focused engagement with transgressive content can contribute to the cultivation of a taste or sensibility for what is morally problematic in those fantasies. If such tastes are morally criticizable, then engaging in practices that cultivate them is also open to moral criticism, even when no one is directly harmed.

Ethics and Information TechnologyVol. 28(4)
University of Bucharest (RO), University of Oxford (GB)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon