From the Safe Intervention Region to Crisis Management: The Point of No Return and the Mitigation of Destructive Consequences in Active Prevention Theory

This working paper develops a conceptual account of the transition from active prevention to crisis management within Active Prevention Theory (APT). It examines the Safe Intervention Region, the Golden Window of Prevention, and the Point of No Return as event-specific concepts. It explains how the operational mission changes after a specified adverse event has occurred, shifting from preventing that event to protecting people, containing damage, mitigating destructive consequences, preventing secondary events, and supporting recovery. The paper also discusses applications in traffic safety, public health, armed conflict, cybersecurity, and environmental risk. It distinguishes crisis preparedness from post-event crisis management and identifies propositions that require further empirical examination. Active Prevention Theory is presented here as a conceptual framework. Its propositions are not claimed to be empirically validated or universally established.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24079045
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

From the Safe Intervention Region to Crisis Management: The Point of No Return and the Mitigation of Destructive Consequences in Active Prevention Theory

Karim Fakhari
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

From the Safe Intervention Region to Crisis Management: The Point of No Return and the Mitigation of Destructive Consequences in Active Prevention Theory

Karim Fakhari
article en

Abstract

This working paper develops a conceptual account of the transition from active prevention to crisis management within Active Prevention Theory (APT). It examines the Safe Intervention Region, the Golden Window of Prevention, and the Point of No Return as event-specific concepts. It explains how the operational mission changes after a specified adverse event has occurred, shifting from preventing that event to protecting people, containing damage, mitigating destructive consequences, preventing secondary events, and supporting recovery. The paper also discusses applications in traffic safety, public health, armed conflict, cybersecurity, and environmental risk. It distinguishes crisis preparedness from post-event crisis management and identifies propositions that require further empirical examination. Active Prevention Theory is presented here as a conceptual framework. Its propositions are not claimed to be empirically validated or universally established.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
From the Safe Intervention Region to Crisis Management: The Point of No Return and the Mitigation of Destructive Consequences in Active Prevention Theory — Karim Fakhari · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS