Can Morphology Inform Philosophy? The Case of Italian Pejoratives as Hybrid Evaluatives

Abstract This study critically engages with and contributes to the Presuppositional Account of Hybrid Evaluatives by studying a set of Italian constructions formed through pejorative suffixation applied to socially connoted bases. Drawing on data from the ItTenTen20 corpus, manually annotated and analysed, the paper shows that these forms combine a socially identifiable target with an unstable degree of offensiveness, linked to morphopragmatic effects related to the suffix. At the same time, the negative evaluation seems presupposed, being relatively resistant to negation and cancellation. The paper argues that such constructions can be described as Hybrid Evaluatives within the framework of the Presuppositional Account of slurs and that they occupy an intermediate position between slurs and thick terms. The paper suggests therefore to describe Hybrid Evaluatives within a continuum, contributing to the ongoing debate on slurs and hate speech.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2026-0021
Primary Topic
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Can Morphology Inform Philosophy? The Case of Italian Pejoratives as Hybrid Evaluatives

Caterina Lupieri
Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
article

Can Morphology Inform Philosophy? The Case of Italian Pejoratives as Hybrid Evaluatives

Caterina Lupieri
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study critically engages with and contributes to the Presuppositional Account of Hybrid Evaluatives by studying a set of Italian constructions formed through pejorative suffixation applied to socially connoted bases. Drawing on data from the ItTenTen20 corpus, manually annotated and analysed, the paper shows that these forms combine a socially identifiable target with an unstable degree of offensiveness, linked to morphopragmatic effects related to the suffix. At the same time, the negative evaluation seems presupposed, being relatively resistant to negation and cancellation. The paper argues that such constructions can be described as Hybrid Evaluatives within the framework of the Presuppositional Account of slurs and that they occupy an intermediate position between slurs and thick terms. The paper suggests therefore to describe Hybrid Evaluatives within a continuum, contributing to the ongoing debate on slurs and hate speech.

Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy
University of Trieste (IT)
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon