Spatiotemporal Variation in Precipitation-Water Requirement Matching of Maize and Its Response to Planting Strategy Optimization in Northeast China

Rainfed spring maize production in semi-arid to semi-humid transition regions is constrained by spatial and temporal mismatches between precipitation supply and crop water demand, yet whether planting strategies optimized for high and stable yield can also improve water supply–demand matching remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize long-term water supply–demand patterns, identify suitable planting strategies under drought at different growth stages, and evaluate their potential benefits for precipitation–crop water demand matching. An APSIM-Maize model, calibrated and validated using observed maize phenology and grain yield, was applied to Liaohe Plain, Northeast China, under historical climate conditions from 1951 to 2020. A total of 125 combinations of cultivar (C), sowing date (S), and planting density (D) were evaluated in each climatic region using the high-stability coefficient, abbreviated as HSC, followed by an assessment of their effects on the water supply–demand ratio, abbreviated as WSDR. Long-term simulations showed that the mean effective precipitation of 515.84 mm was lower than the crop water requirement of 548.54 mm, with precipitation insufficient to meet crop water demand in 64.3% of the years. Water supply–demand matching was particularly weak during the early growing season and in semi-arid regions. Among the 125 tested planting combinations, C4-S5-D1 (middle–late cultivar, late sowing, low planting density) consistently achieved the highest HSC across both climatic regions and drought periods. Compared with conventional management, delaying sowing by 10 days and reducing planting density by 1.0 plant m−2 increased HSC by 9.40–11.87% in the semi-arid region and 4.02–5.00% in the semi-humid region. The subsequent WSDR assessment showed calculated relative increases of 6.44–8.52% and 9.54–12.95% in the semi-arid and semi-humid regions, respectively, across all 22 stations. Notably, the relative increases in HSC were greater in the semi-arid region, whereas those in WSDR were greater in the semi-humid region, highlighting distinct regional responses in drought-condition yield performance and water supply–demand matching to planting-strategy optimization. By linking long-term crop simulations with yield stability assessment and water supply–demand evaluation, this study provides a framework for identifying promising planting combinations within predefined management ranges that may contribute to stable crop production and improved precipitation–crop water demand matching in rainfed agricultural systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16212243
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Spatiotemporal Variation in Precipitation-Water Requirement Matching of Maize and Its Response to Planting Strategy Optimization in Northeast China

Qian Cai, Fengyan Zhao, Guijuan Du, Xiaoyi Wang et al.
Agronomy
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Spatiotemporal Variation in Precipitation-Water Requirement Matching of Maize and Its Response to Planting Strategy Optimization in Northeast China

Qian Cai, Fengyan Zhao, Guijuan Du, Xiaoyi Wang, Yuli Yuan, Haifeng Kang, Yue Zhang, Zhanxiang Sun, Zhenxin Zhang
article en

Abstract

Rainfed spring maize production in semi-arid to semi-humid transition regions is constrained by spatial and temporal mismatches between precipitation supply and crop water demand, yet whether planting strategies optimized for high and stable yield can also improve water supply–demand matching remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize long-term water supply–demand patterns, identify suitable planting strategies under drought at different growth stages, and evaluate their potential benefits for precipitation–crop water demand matching. An APSIM-Maize model, calibrated and validated using observed maize phenology and grain yield, was applied to Liaohe Plain, Northeast China, under historical climate conditions from 1951 to 2020. A total of 125 combinations of cultivar (C), sowing date (S), and planting density (D) were evaluated in each climatic region using the high-stability coefficient, abbreviated as HSC, followed by an assessment of their effects on the water supply–demand ratio, abbreviated as WSDR. Long-term simulations showed that the mean effective precipitation of 515.84 mm was lower than the crop water requirement of 548.54 mm, with precipitation insufficient to meet crop water demand in 64.3% of the years. Water supply–demand matching was particularly weak during the early growing season and in semi-arid regions. Among the 125 tested planting combinations, C4-S5-D1 (middle–late cultivar, late sowing, low planting density) consistently achieved the highest HSC across both climatic regions and drought periods. Compared with conventional management, delaying sowing by 10 days and reducing planting density by 1.0 plant m−2 increased HSC by 9.40–11.87% in the semi-arid region and 4.02–5.00% in the semi-humid region. The subsequent WSDR assessment showed calculated relative increases of 6.44–8.52% and 9.54–12.95% in the semi-arid and semi-humid regions, respectively, across all 22 stations. Notably, the relative increases in HSC were greater in the semi-arid region, whereas those in WSDR were greater in the semi-humid region, highlighting distinct regional responses in drought-condition yield performance and water supply–demand matching to planting-strategy optimization. By linking long-term crop simulations with yield stability assessment and water supply–demand evaluation, this study provides a framework for identifying promising planting combinations within predefined management ranges that may contribute to stable crop production and improved precipitation–crop water demand matching in rainfed agricultural systems.

AgronomyVol. 16(21)
Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon