Working with Tensions

Learning circles are an approach to collaborative adult learning. This article explores how learning circles can be adapted as a co-research method attentive to power and care when addressing cross-organizational challenges in elderly care recruitment and retention. We introduce tension zones and a logic of care as sensitizing lines guiding our analysis of ethnographic material on enacting learning circles as co-research. We analyse three empirically-derived ‘situated moves’ by researcher-facilitators: mattering (negotiating what becomes a shared concern), weaving (relating voices, interests and differences across organizational positions), and pacing (tuning rhythm and tempo to resist premature closure and sustain participation). Rather than seeking early alignment, we show how inquiry was kept open through tinkering with agendas, formats and tempo. We suggest that these situated moves offer a way of naming and navigating ethical work by working from within tensions to support knowledge co-production on more balanced terms across organisational divides.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Studies
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v11i3.172560
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Working with Tensions

Maja Lotz, Marie Kirstejn Aakjær, Charlotte Wegener
Qualitative Studies
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Working with Tensions

Maja Lotz, Marie Kirstejn Aakjær, Charlotte Wegener
article en

Abstract

Learning circles are an approach to collaborative adult learning. This article explores how learning circles can be adapted as a co-research method attentive to power and care when addressing cross-organizational challenges in elderly care recruitment and retention. We introduce tension zones and a logic of care as sensitizing lines guiding our analysis of ethnographic material on enacting learning circles as co-research. We analyse three empirically-derived ‘situated moves’ by researcher-facilitators: mattering (negotiating what becomes a shared concern), weaving (relating voices, interests and differences across organizational positions), and pacing (tuning rhythm and tempo to resist premature closure and sustain participation). Rather than seeking early alignment, we show how inquiry was kept open through tinkering with agendas, formats and tempo. We suggest that these situated moves offer a way of naming and navigating ethical work by working from within tensions to support knowledge co-production on more balanced terms across organisational divides.

Qualitative StudiesVol. 11(3)
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon