AI-Enabled Cryptocurrency Scams and Investor Vulnerability: Evidence on Scam Sophistication, Adoption, Financial Access and Losses

Abstract Cryptocurrency fraud is among the largest categories of financial crime, and generative AI may be raising the scale and persuasiveness of scams. We link AI-enabled scam sophistication, cryptocurrency adoption and financial access to investor losses, using public blockchain-analytics, survey and World Bank data. Scam operations linked to AI tooling earned about 4.5 times more than other operations, a descriptive comparison. Across eleven countries, loss prevalence ranges from 1% to 36%, and exposure alone does not explain the gap. Crypto adoption is unrelated to losses (Spearman ρ = 0.21; interval − 0.46 to 0.74). Account ownership is negatively associated with losses (ρ = −0.74), but is confounded with income and region. We discuss implications for regulators, exchanges and AI providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11383134/v1
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

AI-Enabled Cryptocurrency Scams and Investor Vulnerability: Evidence on Scam Sophistication, Adoption, Financial Access and Losses

Mcxin Tee, Sahila Chellamuthu
Research Square
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
preprint

AI-Enabled Cryptocurrency Scams and Investor Vulnerability: Evidence on Scam Sophistication, Adoption, Financial Access and Losses

Mcxin Tee, Sahila Chellamuthu
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Cryptocurrency fraud is among the largest categories of financial crime, and generative AI may be raising the scale and persuasiveness of scams. We link AI-enabled scam sophistication, cryptocurrency adoption and financial access to investor losses, using public blockchain-analytics, survey and World Bank data. Scam operations linked to AI tooling earned about 4.5 times more than other operations, a descriptive comparison. Across eleven countries, loss prevalence ranges from 1% to 36%, and exposure alone does not explain the gap. Crypto adoption is unrelated to losses (Spearman ρ = 0.21; interval − 0.46 to 0.74). Account ownership is negatively associated with losses (ρ = −0.74), but is confounded with income and region. We discuss implications for regulators, exchanges and AI providers.

Research Square
INTI International University (MY), SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon