Spatial Heterogeneity in TAZ Metrorail Accessibility Effects on Housing Prices Across TOD Categories: An Extended Node–Place Model

Built-environment differences across transit-oriented development (TOD) types shape the capitalization of metrorail accessibility into housing prices, generating spatially heterogeneous effects. Using Shanghai as a case study, this study calculates by-transit accessibility (BTA) based on transit supply–demand ratios and interstation passenger flows and derives metrorail accessibility through a distance-decay function. These measures, alongside station locations and built-environment indicators, inform an extended Node–Place model using K-means clustering to identify TOD types. Building on this classification, distance-threshold and price-grouped hedonic models are employed to examine the spatial heterogeneity of accessibility-price relationships. Results reveal clear spatial differentiation in TOD types. Accessibility thresholds generally increase from the urban core to peripheral areas, ranging from 359.5 to 766.77 m in Stressed and Extended TODs to 885.82–1543.75 m in Balanced and Demand TODs, indicating that no uniform station catchment radius applies across TOD contexts. The direction and degree of accessibility effects also vary by station-area development, distance, and housing price group. TAZ metrorail accessibility is positively associated with housing prices, with stronger effects on upper-middle- and high-price housing in Stressed, Extended, and Balanced TODs, but on low-price and high-price housing near Demand TODs. These differences suggest unequal opportunities to benefit from transit-related locational advantages. The findings inform better coordination of transport, land use, and housing toward more equitable and sustainable urban development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15112129
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Spatial Heterogeneity in TAZ Metrorail Accessibility Effects on Housing Prices Across TOD Categories: An Extended Node–Place Model

Xianhui Hou, Yang Liu, Jingming Liu, Yawei Ren
Land
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Spatial Heterogeneity in TAZ Metrorail Accessibility Effects on Housing Prices Across TOD Categories: An Extended Node–Place Model

Xianhui Hou, Yang Liu, Jingming Liu, Yawei Ren
article en

Abstract

Built-environment differences across transit-oriented development (TOD) types shape the capitalization of metrorail accessibility into housing prices, generating spatially heterogeneous effects. Using Shanghai as a case study, this study calculates by-transit accessibility (BTA) based on transit supply–demand ratios and interstation passenger flows and derives metrorail accessibility through a distance-decay function. These measures, alongside station locations and built-environment indicators, inform an extended Node–Place model using K-means clustering to identify TOD types. Building on this classification, distance-threshold and price-grouped hedonic models are employed to examine the spatial heterogeneity of accessibility-price relationships. Results reveal clear spatial differentiation in TOD types. Accessibility thresholds generally increase from the urban core to peripheral areas, ranging from 359.5 to 766.77 m in Stressed and Extended TODs to 885.82–1543.75 m in Balanced and Demand TODs, indicating that no uniform station catchment radius applies across TOD contexts. The direction and degree of accessibility effects also vary by station-area development, distance, and housing price group. TAZ metrorail accessibility is positively associated with housing prices, with stronger effects on upper-middle- and high-price housing in Stressed, Extended, and Balanced TODs, but on low-price and high-price housing near Demand TODs. These differences suggest unequal opportunities to benefit from transit-related locational advantages. The findings inform better coordination of transport, land use, and housing toward more equitable and sustainable urban development.

LandVol. 15(11)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon