Hidden in plain sight: neurodiversity, creative labour, and the limits of inclusion in the UK screen industries

This article offers a critical, conceptual review of neurodiversity in the UK screen industries. Despite evidenced overrepresentation in the sector, and unlike gender, race, class, and disability, neurodivergence remains largely absent from creative labour scholarship and industry debate. We argue this absence is symptomatic, sustained by inadequate data, conflation with broader disability categories, and creative work’s premium on employability and resilience. Drawing on media industry studies, cultural policy, and critical disability studies, we now develop three claims: that neurodivergent marginalisation operates through the terms of presence rather than absence; that prevailing inclusion models are affirmative rather than transformative, admitting workers to arrangements that themselves produce exclusion; and that access to recognition is stratified by class and place, as diagnosis is rationed by ability to pay and uneven provision. We argue for a neurodivergent labour politics oriented towards collective, structural change, and set out a research agenda with wider international relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cultural Policy
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2026.2760234
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Hidden in plain sight: neurodiversity, creative labour, and the limits of inclusion in the UK screen industries

Amy Genders, David Lee
International Journal of Cultural Policy
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Hidden in plain sight: neurodiversity, creative labour, and the limits of inclusion in the UK screen industries

Amy Genders, David Lee
article en

Abstract

This article offers a critical, conceptual review of neurodiversity in the UK screen industries. Despite evidenced overrepresentation in the sector, and unlike gender, race, class, and disability, neurodivergence remains largely absent from creative labour scholarship and industry debate. We argue this absence is symptomatic, sustained by inadequate data, conflation with broader disability categories, and creative work’s premium on employability and resilience. Drawing on media industry studies, cultural policy, and critical disability studies, we now develop three claims: that neurodivergent marginalisation operates through the terms of presence rather than absence; that prevailing inclusion models are affirmative rather than transformative, admitting workers to arrangements that themselves produce exclusion; and that access to recognition is stratified by class and place, as diagnosis is rationed by ability to pay and uneven provision. We argue for a neurodivergent labour politics oriented towards collective, structural change, and set out a research agenda with wider international relevance.

International Journal of Cultural Policy
University of Leeds (GB), University of the West of England (GB)
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon