Integrated Intelligent Prosthetic Control System: A reliability-aware, predictive and adaptive architecture for powered lower-limb prostheses

Powered lower-limb prostheses increasingly rely on machine learning to infer wearer intent, yet in many existing systems the classifier output is treated directly as the motor command. This paper presents a complete conceptual system architecture in which authority over movement is deliberately allocated across five cooperating subsystems: wearer sensing, environmental perception, a supervisory unit, a local prosthesis controller, and the communication and power infrastructure. The architecture is predictive (anticipation supplies the lead time that authorisation requires), adaptive (wearer-specific patterns are learned within inviolable limits), and reliability-aware (evidence quality and subsystem health continuously shape permitted actions). The core contribution is the system itself, defined by six bounded, independently testable properties that must hold under stated assumptions even when individual subsystems are wrong, late, degraded or compromised: Authority, Validity, Local Independence, Degradation, Reconciliation and Wearer Intervention. The central principle is that a prediction is only evidence; it must earn permission from the limb's actual physical state before it becomes movement. Four distinct objects are kept separate throughout: what the system predicts, what it requests, what the prosthesis authorises, and what the prosthesis ultimately executes. This is a fully specified conceptual architecture. It has not yet been implemented or experimentally validated. Any claim of novelty or effectiveness requires a controller-level literature review, systematic hazard analysis (STPA), formal verification (model checking), and comparative evaluation (fault-injection on a test rig). The architecture is offered as a rigorous, falsifiable foundation for that programme of work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24081929
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Integrated Intelligent Prosthetic Control System: A reliability-aware, predictive and adaptive architecture for powered lower-limb prostheses

Kartik Yadav
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
preprint

Integrated Intelligent Prosthetic Control System: A reliability-aware, predictive and adaptive architecture for powered lower-limb prostheses

Kartik Yadav
preprint en

Abstract

Powered lower-limb prostheses increasingly rely on machine learning to infer wearer intent, yet in many existing systems the classifier output is treated directly as the motor command. This paper presents a complete conceptual system architecture in which authority over movement is deliberately allocated across five cooperating subsystems: wearer sensing, environmental perception, a supervisory unit, a local prosthesis controller, and the communication and power infrastructure. The architecture is predictive (anticipation supplies the lead time that authorisation requires), adaptive (wearer-specific patterns are learned within inviolable limits), and reliability-aware (evidence quality and subsystem health continuously shape permitted actions). The core contribution is the system itself, defined by six bounded, independently testable properties that must hold under stated assumptions even when individual subsystems are wrong, late, degraded or compromised: Authority, Validity, Local Independence, Degradation, Reconciliation and Wearer Intervention. The central principle is that a prediction is only evidence; it must earn permission from the limb's actual physical state before it becomes movement. Four distinct objects are kept separate throughout: what the system predicts, what it requests, what the prosthesis authorises, and what the prosthesis ultimately executes. This is a fully specified conceptual architecture. It has not yet been implemented or experimentally validated. Any claim of novelty or effectiveness requires a controller-level literature review, systematic hazard analysis (STPA), formal verification (model checking), and comparative evaluation (fault-injection on a test rig). The architecture is offered as a rigorous, falsifiable foundation for that programme of work.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon