INTERPRETATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION, STUDENT-CENTERED, TRAINING MODELS, AND WORK FORMS SHAPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHALLENGES OF THE 21ST CENTURY

The article emphasizes that the student-centeredness of general education, interpreted as a crucial path confirmed in practice, is conditioned by the challenges of the 21st century. It is stated that in this process, students become active analyzers and applicators of knowledge and skills, engading in a dialogue to construct their own understanding, and the source of information can be not only the educator, but also the students themselves. The interactive approach is related to “Social Development”, which is based on students forming their own understandings of the topics they learn, where learning primainly occurs within a social relationship (communication) with the teacher or peers. The research provides a scientific commentary from a theoretical and technological perspective on the inquiry and research, problem-based, and project-based student-centered models of student-centered learning. It is shown that inquiry and research-based instruction is a model adapted to the teaching process of the scientific method, aligning learning with intellectual curiosity and is a student-centered approach. This constructivist-based instructional model begins with the student's prior knowledge and concepts, guiding them and toward the question and prompting them to take action to find an answer. The article presents problem-based learning as one of the student-centered instructional models. It is shown that when this model is applied, students are engaged in activities to solve problems that are aligned with the subject's content. Thinking about a problem, discussing it thoroughly, and working to solve it develops skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication. It is emphasized that both project-based and problem-based learning models share common features, as they are both student-centered. At the same time, the research notes that students' inability to often connect the knowledge they acquire during the learning process with real life also diminishes their interest in which learning. Sometimes it seems that the theoretical knowledge learned does not find its application in life. However, education is not just about learning theoretical knowledge, it also involves the application of that knowledge in real life. A project-based learning model is one of the effective alternatives for implementing this holistic approach. The authors of the article comment that in student-centered (interactive) training, work formats are structured in four ways: individual, pairs, groups, and whole-class work formats. When organized at the right time and in the right way, each of these four forms of activity can meet students' learning needs and yield effective results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24092249
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

INTERPRETATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION, STUDENT-CENTERED, TRAINING MODELS, AND WORK FORMS SHAPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHALLENGES OF THE 21ST CENTURY

F. İbrahimov, Mehriban Karimova
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Problem and Project Based Learning
article

INTERPRETATION OF GENERAL EDUCATION, STUDENT-CENTERED, TRAINING MODELS, AND WORK FORMS SHAPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHALLENGES OF THE 21ST CENTURY

F. İbrahimov, Mehriban Karimova
article en

Abstract

The article emphasizes that the student-centeredness of general education, interpreted as a crucial path confirmed in practice, is conditioned by the challenges of the 21st century. It is stated that in this process, students become active analyzers and applicators of knowledge and skills, engading in a dialogue to construct their own understanding, and the source of information can be not only the educator, but also the students themselves. The interactive approach is related to “Social Development”, which is based on students forming their own understandings of the topics they learn, where learning primainly occurs within a social relationship (communication) with the teacher or peers. The research provides a scientific commentary from a theoretical and technological perspective on the inquiry and research, problem-based, and project-based student-centered models of student-centered learning. It is shown that inquiry and research-based instruction is a model adapted to the teaching process of the scientific method, aligning learning with intellectual curiosity and is a student-centered approach. This constructivist-based instructional model begins with the student's prior knowledge and concepts, guiding them and toward the question and prompting them to take action to find an answer. The article presents problem-based learning as one of the student-centered instructional models. It is shown that when this model is applied, students are engaged in activities to solve problems that are aligned with the subject's content. Thinking about a problem, discussing it thoroughly, and working to solve it develops skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication. It is emphasized that both project-based and problem-based learning models share common features, as they are both student-centered. At the same time, the research notes that students' inability to often connect the knowledge they acquire during the learning process with real life also diminishes their interest in which learning. Sometimes it seems that the theoretical knowledge learned does not find its application in life. However, education is not just about learning theoretical knowledge, it also involves the application of that knowledge in real life. A project-based learning model is one of the effective alternatives for implementing this holistic approach. The authors of the article comment that in student-centered (interactive) training, work formats are structured in four ways: individual, pairs, groups, and whole-class work formats. When organized at the right time and in the right way, each of these four forms of activity can meet students' learning needs and yield effective results.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Problem and Project Based Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon