Classifying Synthetic 3D Particle Shapes Using Classical Descriptors and Point Cloud Networks

Abstract This paper evaluates geometric rules, Random Forest, PointNet and PointNet⁠+⁠+ in the classification of synthetic particles as either spherical, angular, elongated or platy. We created 8,000 labeled particles and a further 800 elongated/platy boundary set. Random Forest achieved 100% accuracy on the original test split while both deep 2,048-point network architectures reached 99.92%. On the boundary set, the validation tuned rule achieved 100% accuracy and Random Forest achieved 80.12%. Of the eight complete deep architectures tested, PointNet⁠+⁠+ with 2,048 points and without any augmented training rotations achieved the highest accuracy of 87.88%. A sensitivity analysis was carried out on factors including number of points, training augmentations, new test rotations, rule thresholds and class recall. The uncertainty estimates utilized bootstrapping within geometry groups. Interpretation is not straightforward: of 1,200 original test particles, 916 have exact geometric matching within training. Random Forest also achieved 100% accuracy on a further geometry-based test set, while the deep learning models were not tested on this split. Streamlit provides the inference of saved models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11643386/v1
Primary Topic
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Classifying Synthetic 3D Particle Shapes Using Classical Descriptors and Point Cloud Networks

Mayank Goswami, Tanisha Kumari
Research Square
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
preprint

Classifying Synthetic 3D Particle Shapes Using Classical Descriptors and Point Cloud Networks

Mayank Goswami, Tanisha Kumari
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract This paper evaluates geometric rules, Random Forest, PointNet and PointNet⁠+⁠+ in the classification of synthetic particles as either spherical, angular, elongated or platy. We created 8,000 labeled particles and a further 800 elongated/platy boundary set. Random Forest achieved 100% accuracy on the original test split while both deep 2,048-point network architectures reached 99.92%. On the boundary set, the validation tuned rule achieved 100% accuracy and Random Forest achieved 80.12%. Of the eight complete deep architectures tested, PointNet⁠+⁠+ with 2,048 points and without any augmented training rotations achieved the highest accuracy of 87.88%. A sensitivity analysis was carried out on factors including number of points, training augmentations, new test rotations, rule thresholds and class recall. The uncertainty estimates utilized bootstrapping within geometry groups. Interpretation is not straightforward: of 1,200 original test particles, 916 have exact geometric matching within training. Random Forest also achieved 100% accuracy on a further geometry-based test set, while the deep learning models were not tested on this split. Streamlit provides the inference of saved models.

Research Square
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon