The Inter-Well Map

All-Fields programme paper (All-Fields Run, Batch 17 (AF)), November 2026. Written November 2026; publicly deposited 9 November 2026. AF-40 graded the neighbour axis about the A = 40 well from the shortfall side through a continuous region to the map's edge at A′ = 82, where the census maximum stood at the surviving closure, 82, on a plateau still widening. Its falsifier F-next carried the same census past the edge: from A′ = 82 toward the next well's mass number (A′ = 90, the (90, 126) well's own A) and its closure (126), grading whether the maximum holds at 82, climbs toward 126, or falls back, and whether the 82 plateau closes — its lower edge turning back up — before the next well's territory begins. This paper runs that continuation, A′ = 83..90, with the boundary row A′ = 82 re-censused as its certification. The maximum climbs at the first step: 90 from A′ = 83, its plateau's lower edge receding steadily (0.921, 0.836, 0.752, 0.668); 92 at A′ = 87, where the maximum's plateau stands instead at the range's lower end, ten strengths wide, widening to 48 at A′ = 88; 94 at A′ = 89, the plateau back at the upper end and widening to 323 strengths at A′ = 90. The 82 plateau, in the reach sense, does not close but com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24086597
Primary Topic
Astronomical and nuclear sciences
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

The Inter-Well Map

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astronomical and nuclear sciences
preprint

The Inter-Well Map

William Alexander Aldred
preprint en

Abstract

All-Fields programme paper (All-Fields Run, Batch 17 (AF)), November 2026. Written November 2026; publicly deposited 9 November 2026. AF-40 graded the neighbour axis about the A = 40 well from the shortfall side through a continuous region to the map's edge at A′ = 82, where the census maximum stood at the surviving closure, 82, on a plateau still widening. Its falsifier F-next carried the same census past the edge: from A′ = 82 toward the next well's mass number (A′ = 90, the (90, 126) well's own A) and its closure (126), grading whether the maximum holds at 82, climbs toward 126, or falls back, and whether the 82 plateau closes — its lower edge turning back up — before the next well's territory begins. This paper runs that continuation, A′ = 83..90, with the boundary row A′ = 82 re-censused as its certification. The maximum climbs at the first step: 90 from A′ = 83, its plateau's lower edge receding steadily (0.921, 0.836, 0.752, 0.668); 92 at A′ = 87, where the maximum's plateau stands instead at the range's lower end, ten strengths wide, widening to 48 at A′ = 88; 94 at A′ = 89, the plateau back at the upper end and widening to 323 strengths at A′ = 90. The 82 plateau, in the reach sense, does not close but com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astronomical and nuclear sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon