Contrasting within-donor gene covariation identifies disease-associated cells and genes in case-control single-cell studies

In case-control single-cell studies, disease often affects only a subset of cells of a given type within each patient. Comparing all cells from patients with all cells from control donors therefore dilutes disease signals, while donor variation and recorded or unrecorded batch effects can be confounded with disease status. We present IDC (Identification of Disease-associated Cells), which uses this cellular heterogeneity as signal. A mixture of affected and unaffected cells creates coordinated variation among disease-associated genes within each patient, whereas shifts shared by all cells of a donor leave this within-donor covariance unchanged. IDC therefore contrasts within-donor gene-gene covariance between patients and controls to learn disease-associated expression programs without batch labels, then applies positive-unlabeled learning to score each cell's disease-like state and estimate each donor's disease burden. IDC also computes, in closed form, gene contribution scores and leave-gene-out cell scores that exclude each tested gene, enabling within-donor differential expression testing and cross-donor meta-analysis without retraining. In simulations, IDC identified affected cells and estimated donor burden more accurately than deep generative and label-refinement methods, remained robust to strong unrecorded batch effects, and detected differentially expressed genes more sensitively than case-control pseudobulk methods while controlling false discoveries. In human pancreatic islets and prefrontal cortex, disease burden in held-out donors separated type 2 diabetes (T2D) from non-diabetic donors in beta cells, and late-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) from non-AD donors in astrocytes and inhibitory neurons, while placing prediabetic and early-AD donors at intermediate levels. Genes with the highest IDC contribution scores were more strongly enriched for the KEGG T2D and AD pathways than case-control pseudobulk rankings, and within-donor testing revealed coordinated metabolic, cell-adhesion and synaptic changes along the inferred disease axis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.06.764894
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Contrasting within-donor gene covariation identifies disease-associated cells and genes in case-control single-cell studies

Zhana Duren, Haga Cham
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
preprint

Contrasting within-donor gene covariation identifies disease-associated cells and genes in case-control single-cell studies

Zhana Duren, Haga Cham
preprint en

Abstract

In case-control single-cell studies, disease often affects only a subset of cells of a given type within each patient. Comparing all cells from patients with all cells from control donors therefore dilutes disease signals, while donor variation and recorded or unrecorded batch effects can be confounded with disease status. We present IDC (Identification of Disease-associated Cells), which uses this cellular heterogeneity as signal. A mixture of affected and unaffected cells creates coordinated variation among disease-associated genes within each patient, whereas shifts shared by all cells of a donor leave this within-donor covariance unchanged. IDC therefore contrasts within-donor gene-gene covariance between patients and controls to learn disease-associated expression programs without batch labels, then applies positive-unlabeled learning to score each cell's disease-like state and estimate each donor's disease burden. IDC also computes, in closed form, gene contribution scores and leave-gene-out cell scores that exclude each tested gene, enabling within-donor differential expression testing and cross-donor meta-analysis without retraining. In simulations, IDC identified affected cells and estimated donor burden more accurately than deep generative and label-refinement methods, remained robust to strong unrecorded batch effects, and detected differentially expressed genes more sensitively than case-control pseudobulk methods while controlling false discoveries. In human pancreatic islets and prefrontal cortex, disease burden in held-out donors separated type 2 diabetes (T2D) from non-diabetic donors in beta cells, and late-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) from non-AD donors in astrocytes and inhibitory neurons, while placing prediabetic and early-AD donors at intermediate levels. Genes with the highest IDC contribution scores were more strongly enriched for the KEGG T2D and AD pathways than case-control pseudobulk rankings, and within-donor testing revealed coordinated metabolic, cell-adhesion and synaptic changes along the inferred disease axis.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Indiana University School of Medicine (US), Clemson University (US)
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon