Resource‐efficient potato fertilization in acid Inceptisols using a soil‐test crop response framework: Mineral‐input savings, field validation, and screening upstream urea‐manufacturing implications

Abstract Efficient fertilizer management in acid soils requires decision frameworks that translate soil‐test variability into crop‐specific nutrient demand while minimizing unnecessary mineral inputs. This study developed and field‐validated Soil Test Crop Response (STCR) fertilizer prescriptions for potato under acid Inceptisol conditions in Meghalaya, India. A three‐phase field program conducted during 2022–2024 established fertility gradients, derived crop nutrient‐response parameters, and independently validated STCR‐NPK and integrated plant nutrient supply (STCR‐IPNS) prescriptions at target yields of 100, 125, and 150 q ha −1 . Nutrient requirements for producing one quintal of tubers were 0.56 kg N, 0.26 kg P, and 0.93 kg K. Across the prescription matrix, FYM integration reduced mineral‐N demand by 23.76–23.80 kg N ha −1 and K 2 O demand by 7.0–7.1 kg ha −1 , while realized P 2 O 5 savings ranged from 0 to 32.7 kg ha −1 depending on soil‐test P and target yield. Aggregate realized mineral nutrient‐equivalent savings ranged from 30.76 to 63.60 kg ha −1 . All six targeted‐yield treatments remained within ±10% of prescribed yields, with a mean absolute target deviation of 6.04%, and STCR‐IPNS maintained tuber yield relative to STCR‐NPK. Mineral‐N displacement corresponded to 51.65–51.74 kg urea‐equivalent ha −1 and a screening estimate of 79.7–97.4 kg CO 2 ‐eq ha −1 of gross upstream urea‐manufacturing burden potentially avoided. This indicator excludes other fertilizer‐system and field emissions. Overall, STCR‐IPNS maintained predefined potato yield targets while reducing external mineral‐fertilizer demand and supporting resource‐efficient nutrient management in acidic soils. The framework supports precise fertilizer targeting, mineral‐resource conservation, and integration of organic nutrient credits in acid‐soil potato production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70783
Primary Topic
Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Resource‐efficient potato fertilization in acid Inceptisols using a soil‐test crop response framework: Mineral‐input savings, field validation, and screening upstream urea‐manufacturing implications

Abdallah Elshawadfy Elwakeel, Ali Majrashi, Atef Fathy Ahmed, Rüstem Üstün et al.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Agricultural Science and Fertilization
article

Resource‐efficient potato fertilization in acid Inceptisols using a soil‐test crop response framework: Mineral‐input savings, field validation, and screening upstream urea‐manufacturing implications

Abdallah Elshawadfy Elwakeel, Ali Majrashi, Atef Fathy Ahmed, Rüstem Üstün, Pepakayala Varalakshmi, Manojit Chowdhury, Sanjay Swami, Duddukur Rajasekhar, Wael Abdel-Moneim Omar, M. Sri Sai Charan Sathya, T. Sunil Kumar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Efficient fertilizer management in acid soils requires decision frameworks that translate soil‐test variability into crop‐specific nutrient demand while minimizing unnecessary mineral inputs. This study developed and field‐validated Soil Test Crop Response (STCR) fertilizer prescriptions for potato under acid Inceptisol conditions in Meghalaya, India. A three‐phase field program conducted during 2022–2024 established fertility gradients, derived crop nutrient‐response parameters, and independently validated STCR‐NPK and integrated plant nutrient supply (STCR‐IPNS) prescriptions at target yields of 100, 125, and 150 q ha −1 . Nutrient requirements for producing one quintal of tubers were 0.56 kg N, 0.26 kg P, and 0.93 kg K. Across the prescription matrix, FYM integration reduced mineral‐N demand by 23.76–23.80 kg N ha −1 and K 2 O demand by 7.0–7.1 kg ha −1 , while realized P 2 O 5 savings ranged from 0 to 32.7 kg ha −1 depending on soil‐test P and target yield. Aggregate realized mineral nutrient‐equivalent savings ranged from 30.76 to 63.60 kg ha −1 . All six targeted‐yield treatments remained within ±10% of prescribed yields, with a mean absolute target deviation of 6.04%, and STCR‐IPNS maintained tuber yield relative to STCR‐NPK. Mineral‐N displacement corresponded to 51.65–51.74 kg urea‐equivalent ha −1 and a screening estimate of 79.7–97.4 kg CO 2 ‐eq ha −1 of gross upstream urea‐manufacturing burden potentially avoided. This indicator excludes other fertilizer‐system and field emissions. Overall, STCR‐IPNS maintained predefined potato yield targets while reducing external mineral‐fertilizer demand and supporting resource‐efficient nutrient management in acidic soils. The framework supports precise fertilizer targeting, mineral‐resource conservation, and integration of organic nutrient credits in acid‐soil potato production systems.

Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University (IN), Visva-Bharati University (IN), Taif University (SA), Akdeniz University (TR), Malla Reddy University (IN), Central Agricultural University (IN), Aswan University (EG)
Agricultural Science and Fertilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon