Jump Epistemics: Topology, Pathology, and Dynamics for Finite Embedded Epistemic Agents

Jump Epistemics develops a meta-epistemology of knowledge generation for finite embedded epistemic agents. It represents epistemic activity as a forward-growing chain of costly loops and introduces five basic elements—memory–computation, distinction, record, index, and presupposition—together with derived judgments of evidence, reliability, qualification, and grounding. On this basis, the paper distinguishes legitimate local closure from final closure, recorded forward openness from backward and endless opening, and classifies pathologies of closure, openness, configuration, and order. A configurational account of inquiry and targeting shows why qualification depends on actual generative conditions rather than on the name or numerical value of an output. From this account the paper derives a strict form of Goodhart’s law: targeting can preserve an indicator’s symbolic identity while destroying its referential identity relative to the assertions it supports (support equivalence). A proposition on identity follows: sameness of name is not self-certifying, since the loss of referential identity cannot be registered by the records of the identically named indicator itself; identity is supplied by generative history, which cannot be recovered from the value. Applications include quotient formation, fraction reduction, diachronic reconstruction, numerical approximation, and the logical form of quantum-measurement puzzles. JE is operational and non-exempt: it takes no position on the first-order content of the domains it reviews, each of its reviews is an executed computation, and its own assertions fall under the same review. The framework permits conditional, corrigible knowledge without self-grounding, while specifying the additional evidence, declared restrictions, weakened targets, or derivations required for legitimate epistemic promotion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24089242
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Jump Epistemics: Topology, Pathology, and Dynamics for Finite Embedded Epistemic Agents

Ruipeng Shi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Jump Epistemics: Topology, Pathology, and Dynamics for Finite Embedded Epistemic Agents

Ruipeng Shi
article en

Abstract

Jump Epistemics develops a meta-epistemology of knowledge generation for finite embedded epistemic agents. It represents epistemic activity as a forward-growing chain of costly loops and introduces five basic elements—memory–computation, distinction, record, index, and presupposition—together with derived judgments of evidence, reliability, qualification, and grounding. On this basis, the paper distinguishes legitimate local closure from final closure, recorded forward openness from backward and endless opening, and classifies pathologies of closure, openness, configuration, and order. A configurational account of inquiry and targeting shows why qualification depends on actual generative conditions rather than on the name or numerical value of an output. From this account the paper derives a strict form of Goodhart’s law: targeting can preserve an indicator’s symbolic identity while destroying its referential identity relative to the assertions it supports (support equivalence). A proposition on identity follows: sameness of name is not self-certifying, since the loss of referential identity cannot be registered by the records of the identically named indicator itself; identity is supplied by generative history, which cannot be recovered from the value. Applications include quotient formation, fraction reduction, diachronic reconstruction, numerical approximation, and the logical form of quantum-measurement puzzles. JE is operational and non-exempt: it takes no position on the first-order content of the domains it reviews, each of its reviews is an executed computation, and its own assertions fall under the same review. The framework permits conditional, corrigible knowledge without self-grounding, while specifying the additional evidence, declared restrictions, weakened targets, or derivations required for legitimate epistemic promotion.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon