An interpretable XGBoost model for predicting measured teicoplanin plasma concentrations in ICU patients with bloodstream infection: a two-center real-world validation study

Background Profound pharmacokinetic variability complicates individualized teicoplanin therapy in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection. We aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting teicoplanin plasma concentrations in this population. Methods This retrospective two-center real-world study included 260 intensive care unit patients from one center as the modeling cohort (randomly split 8:2 into training and internal test sets) and 91 patients from an independent center as the external validation cohort. Ten ML and deep learning algorithms were constructed using demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. The optimal model was interpreted via Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the most favorable point estimates. On the internal test set (n = 52): the model yielded an R 2 of 0.73 (95% CI 0.56–0.81), RMSE of 3.22 (95% CI 2.62–3.77), MAE of 2.52 (95% CI 1.98–3.10), and ±30% prediction accuracy (P30%) of 78.8% (95% CI 67.3–88.5). On the external validation cohort (n = 91), it achieved an R 2 of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), RMSE of 3.61 (95% CI 3.08–4.14), MAE of 2.89 (95% CI 2.48–3.35), and P30% of 69.2% (95% CI 59.3–78.0). After Holm–Bonferroni correction, paired bootstrap comparisons showed XGBoost significantly outperformed 5 of 9 comparator algorithms in the internal test set and 7 of 9 in the external cohort, with performance comparable to several other tree-based ensemble methods. SHAP analysis identified daily dose, hemodialysis, and mechanical ventilation as features positively associated with predicted teicoplanin concentrations. Conclusion This internally and externally validated interpretable XGBoost model delivers consistent cross-cohort performance, and serves as a dose-anchored adjunct to conventional therapeutic drug monitoring, providing a preliminary methodological foundation for exploring individualized teicoplanin dosing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1963274
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

An interpretable XGBoost model for predicting measured teicoplanin plasma concentrations in ICU patients with bloodstream infection: a two-center real-world validation study

Chunming Lyu, Yang Liu, Yuanan Ma, Wenbin Zhou et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

An interpretable XGBoost model for predicting measured teicoplanin plasma concentrations in ICU patients with bloodstream infection: a two-center real-world validation study

Chunming Lyu, Yang Liu, Yuanan Ma, Wenbin Zhou, Lhamo Sonam, Lixin Wei, Yuancan Xiao, Ming Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background Profound pharmacokinetic variability complicates individualized teicoplanin therapy in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection. We aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting teicoplanin plasma concentrations in this population. Methods This retrospective two-center real-world study included 260 intensive care unit patients from one center as the modeling cohort (randomly split 8:2 into training and internal test sets) and 91 patients from an independent center as the external validation cohort. Ten ML and deep learning algorithms were constructed using demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. The optimal model was interpreted via Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the most favorable point estimates. On the internal test set (n = 52): the model yielded an R 2 of 0.73 (95% CI 0.56–0.81), RMSE of 3.22 (95% CI 2.62–3.77), MAE of 2.52 (95% CI 1.98–3.10), and ±30% prediction accuracy (P30%) of 78.8% (95% CI 67.3–88.5). On the external validation cohort (n = 91), it achieved an R 2 of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), RMSE of 3.61 (95% CI 3.08–4.14), MAE of 2.89 (95% CI 2.48–3.35), and P30% of 69.2% (95% CI 59.3–78.0). After Holm–Bonferroni correction, paired bootstrap comparisons showed XGBoost significantly outperformed 5 of 9 comparator algorithms in the internal test set and 7 of 9 in the external cohort, with performance comparable to several other tree-based ensemble methods. SHAP analysis identified daily dose, hemodialysis, and mechanical ventilation as features positively associated with predicted teicoplanin concentrations. Conclusion This internally and externally validated interpretable XGBoost model delivers consistent cross-cohort performance, and serves as a dose-anchored adjunct to conventional therapeutic drug monitoring, providing a preliminary methodological foundation for exploring individualized teicoplanin dosing strategies.

Frontiers in PharmacologyVol. 17
Qinghai University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology (CN)
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon