Non‐Pharmacological Interventions for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review of Delivery Characteristics and Relevance to Nursing Practice

ABSTRACT Background Cognitive impairment is common and disabling in Parkinson's disease and may progress to dementia in up to 80% of individuals. Non‐pharmacological interventions are increasingly studied, but their modalities, delivery characteristics and clinical applicability remain unclear. Aim To map and synthesise evidence on non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease, characterise intervention modalities and delivery features and examine relevance to nursing practice. Design Scoping review. Methods Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Data were synthesised descriptively using an intervention modality and delivery characteristics framework. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Ichushi‐Web were searched from inception to October 2025. Results Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria; most were published after 2020. Interventions included cognitive training ( n = 12) and exercise and dual‐task programmes ( n = 5). Four cognitive training interventions used technology‐assisted, home‐based platforms. Most were delivered by neuropsychologists or physiotherapists in facility‐based settings; only one was nurse‐led. Conclusions Non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease are largely non‐invasive and involve structured cognitive, physical or technology‐assisted components. The scarcity of nurse‐led interventions highlights a critical evidence gap and underscores the need for nurse‐led and nurse‐coordinated cognitive care models. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Nurses are well positioned to support, coordinate and monitor non‐pharmacological cognitive and exercise‐based interventions for people with Parkinson's disease, particularly in home‐based and technology‐assisted formats. Impact This review mapped 17 studies of non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease and characterised their modalities and delivery features. Technology‐assisted and home‐based formats were identified as an emerging trend, although most interventions remained specialist‐led and facility‐based. The near‐absence of nurse‐led interventions highlights a critical evidence gap and an important opportunity to develop nurse‐led and nurse‐coordinated models of cognitive care. Trial Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QDMGJ ; registered 9 October 2025; Open Science Framework. Reporting Method This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. No Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution was required because this review synthesised published literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70634
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Non‐Pharmacological Interventions for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review of Delivery Characteristics and Relevance to Nursing Practice

Kohei Kajiwara, Yasuhide Etou, Miyuki Imazawa, Yasuko Nishimura
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Non‐Pharmacological Interventions for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review of Delivery Characteristics and Relevance to Nursing Practice

Kohei Kajiwara, Yasuhide Etou, Miyuki Imazawa, Yasuko Nishimura
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cognitive impairment is common and disabling in Parkinson's disease and may progress to dementia in up to 80% of individuals. Non‐pharmacological interventions are increasingly studied, but their modalities, delivery characteristics and clinical applicability remain unclear. Aim To map and synthesise evidence on non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease, characterise intervention modalities and delivery features and examine relevance to nursing practice. Design Scoping review. Methods Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Data were synthesised descriptively using an intervention modality and delivery characteristics framework. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Ichushi‐Web were searched from inception to October 2025. Results Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria; most were published after 2020. Interventions included cognitive training ( n = 12) and exercise and dual‐task programmes ( n = 5). Four cognitive training interventions used technology‐assisted, home‐based platforms. Most were delivered by neuropsychologists or physiotherapists in facility‐based settings; only one was nurse‐led. Conclusions Non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease are largely non‐invasive and involve structured cognitive, physical or technology‐assisted components. The scarcity of nurse‐led interventions highlights a critical evidence gap and underscores the need for nurse‐led and nurse‐coordinated cognitive care models. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Nurses are well positioned to support, coordinate and monitor non‐pharmacological cognitive and exercise‐based interventions for people with Parkinson's disease, particularly in home‐based and technology‐assisted formats. Impact This review mapped 17 studies of non‐pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease and characterised their modalities and delivery features. Technology‐assisted and home‐based formats were identified as an emerging trend, although most interventions remained specialist‐led and facility‐based. The near‐absence of nurse‐led interventions highlights a critical evidence gap and an important opportunity to develop nurse‐led and nurse‐coordinated models of cognitive care. Trial Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QDMGJ ; registered 9 October 2025; Open Science Framework. Reporting Method This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. No Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution was required because this review synthesised published literature.

Journal of Clinical Nursing
Shimonoseki City University (JP)
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon