A mixed methods evaluation of confidence, competence, and perceived value following a Teaching Institute on artificial intelligence for gerontology educators

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, gerontology educators face new opportunities and ethical challenges when integrating AI tools into teaching, mentorship, and professional practice. Rapid advances in AI, alongside evolving aging research and policy, require educators to adapt their pedagogical approaches. Organizers for the Academy for Gerontology in Higher Education’s 14th Annual Teaching Institute sought to address this need by providing instructor-focused professional development on emerging issues of AI in gerontology education, with an emphasis on ethical, inclusive, and discipline-specific applications. In this paper, we describe the rationale, structure, and content of the 14th Annual Teaching Institute and examine its impact on instructor confidence and perceived competence with utilizing AI professionally. A mixed methods evaluation of the workshop included pre- and post-surveys, confidence ratings, and qualitative feedback from attendees (N = 21). Quantitative results demonstrated statistically significant increases in confidence and perceived competence using AI across multiple professional domains. Qualitative findings highlighted the value of peer learning, hands-on activities, and contextualized discussions of AI in gerontology education. Findings suggest that structured, interactive professional development can enhance instructors’ capacity to engage critically and responsibly with AI while reinforcing core gerontology competencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gerontology & Geriatrics Education
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2026.2760236
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A mixed methods evaluation of confidence, competence, and perceived value following a Teaching Institute on artificial intelligence for gerontology educators

Tina M K Newsham, Brian G. Chapman, Laura K. M. Donorfio, Erta Cenko et al.
Gerontology & Geriatrics Education
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

A mixed methods evaluation of confidence, competence, and perceived value following a Teaching Institute on artificial intelligence for gerontology educators

Tina M K Newsham, Brian G. Chapman, Laura K. M. Donorfio, Erta Cenko, Abigail T. Stephan, Nels P. Highberg, Cynthia McNellis, Alexis B. Bernhardt
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, gerontology educators face new opportunities and ethical challenges when integrating AI tools into teaching, mentorship, and professional practice. Rapid advances in AI, alongside evolving aging research and policy, require educators to adapt their pedagogical approaches. Organizers for the Academy for Gerontology in Higher Education’s 14th Annual Teaching Institute sought to address this need by providing instructor-focused professional development on emerging issues of AI in gerontology education, with an emphasis on ethical, inclusive, and discipline-specific applications. In this paper, we describe the rationale, structure, and content of the 14th Annual Teaching Institute and examine its impact on instructor confidence and perceived competence with utilizing AI professionally. A mixed methods evaluation of the workshop included pre- and post-surveys, confidence ratings, and qualitative feedback from attendees (N = 21). Quantitative results demonstrated statistically significant increases in confidence and perceived competence using AI across multiple professional domains. Qualitative findings highlighted the value of peer learning, hands-on activities, and contextualized discussions of AI in gerontology education. Findings suggest that structured, interactive professional development can enhance instructors’ capacity to engage critically and responsibly with AI while reinforcing core gerontology competencies.

Gerontology & Geriatrics Education
University of Connecticut (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Hartford (US), University of Florida (US), Georgia Southern University (US), Clemson University (US)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon