Monoclonal Gammopathy of Neurologic Significance: A Practical Framework for Diagnosis and Management

Monoclonal gammopathy of neurologic significance (MGNS) refers to peripheral neuropathies that are attributable to a monoclonal immunoglobulin produced by an underlying clonal plasma cell population or B-cell population in the absence of multiple myeloma, amyloid light chain amyloidosis, or polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, skin changes syndrome. Because the prevalence of both monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and peripheral neuropathy increases with age, their coexistence is frequently incidental. However, population-based studies demonstrate a significantly higher risk of neuropathy among patients with MGUS compared with matched controls. Establishing causality requires careful clinical phenotyping, correlation with electrodiagnostic studies, and systematic exclusion of alternative and potentially life-threatening causes that require urgent intervention. This review presents a practical, stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic framework for MGNS, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration between hematology and neurology. The approach is illustrated through two representative clinical scenarios: IgM MGUS with anti–myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy and non-IgM MGUS with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) or its variants. Treatment approaches differ fundamentally between these subtypes. B-cell–directed therapy with rituximab is the most commonly used first-line treatment for IgM anti-MAG neuropathy, whereas non-IgM MGNS with CIDP is managed with immunomodulatory strategies including intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, and plasmapheresis. We also discuss novel therapeutics, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and complement-directed therapies. This framework provides clinicians with a structured approach to assess causal likelihood, stratify patients by neuropathy subtype, and guide evidence-based treatment decisions across the MGNS spectrum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-26-00658
Primary Topic
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Neurologic Significance: A Practical Framework for Diagnosis and Management

Brandon Tedder, Manisha Bhutani, Urvi G. Desai, Barry A. Paul et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
article

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Neurologic Significance: A Practical Framework for Diagnosis and Management

Brandon Tedder, Manisha Bhutani, Urvi G. Desai, Barry A. Paul, Martin Porebski
article en

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of neurologic significance (MGNS) refers to peripheral neuropathies that are attributable to a monoclonal immunoglobulin produced by an underlying clonal plasma cell population or B-cell population in the absence of multiple myeloma, amyloid light chain amyloidosis, or polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, skin changes syndrome. Because the prevalence of both monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and peripheral neuropathy increases with age, their coexistence is frequently incidental. However, population-based studies demonstrate a significantly higher risk of neuropathy among patients with MGUS compared with matched controls. Establishing causality requires careful clinical phenotyping, correlation with electrodiagnostic studies, and systematic exclusion of alternative and potentially life-threatening causes that require urgent intervention. This review presents a practical, stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic framework for MGNS, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration between hematology and neurology. The approach is illustrated through two representative clinical scenarios: IgM MGUS with anti–myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy and non-IgM MGUS with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) or its variants. Treatment approaches differ fundamentally between these subtypes. B-cell–directed therapy with rituximab is the most commonly used first-line treatment for IgM anti-MAG neuropathy, whereas non-IgM MGNS with CIDP is managed with immunomodulatory strategies including intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, and plasmapheresis. We also discuss novel therapeutics, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and complement-directed therapies. This framework provides clinicians with a structured approach to assess causal likelihood, stratify patients by neuropathy subtype, and guide evidence-based treatment decisions across the MGNS spectrum.

JCO Oncology Practice
Levine Cancer Institute (US), Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon