A natural field experiment on the effectiveness of economic sanctions before and after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Abstract Here, using two rounds of natural field experiments based on an audit-study approach, we investigated whether sanctioned Russian government officials retain access to the international financial system. Researchers sent 7,081 email solicitations to intermediary firms in 202 countries and jurisdictions to establish shell companies and set up corporate bank accounts. Responses to sanctioned names (middle initial modified) are compared with equivalent solicitations from non-sanctioned placebo names. Round 1 results in December 2020 reveal no statistically significant difference in financial access for the sanctioned names compared with placebo. Round 2 findings in May 2022, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, indicate that sanctioned individuals’ access to international corporate services and banking was significantly reduced (drop in non-compliant response rates: 4.0 percentage points, 95% confidence interval 1.2–6.8, P = 0.006, Cohen’s d = 0.207). The results suggest that factors related to the war and not sanctions law proved decisive in constricting sanctioned individuals’ access to the global financial system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02591-5
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A natural field experiment on the effectiveness of economic sanctions before and after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Michael G. Findley, Daniel Nielson, J. C. Sharman
Nature Human Behaviour
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

A natural field experiment on the effectiveness of economic sanctions before and after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Michael G. Findley, Daniel Nielson, J. C. Sharman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Here, using two rounds of natural field experiments based on an audit-study approach, we investigated whether sanctioned Russian government officials retain access to the international financial system. Researchers sent 7,081 email solicitations to intermediary firms in 202 countries and jurisdictions to establish shell companies and set up corporate bank accounts. Responses to sanctioned names (middle initial modified) are compared with equivalent solicitations from non-sanctioned placebo names. Round 1 results in December 2020 reveal no statistically significant difference in financial access for the sanctioned names compared with placebo. Round 2 findings in May 2022, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, indicate that sanctioned individuals’ access to international corporate services and banking was significantly reduced (drop in non-compliant response rates: 4.0 percentage points, 95% confidence interval 1.2–6.8, P = 0.006, Cohen’s d = 0.207). The results suggest that factors related to the war and not sanctions law proved decisive in constricting sanctioned individuals’ access to the global financial system.

Nature Human Behaviour
University of Cambridge (GB), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
A natural field experiment on the effectiveness of economic sanctions before and after the Russian invasion of Ukraine — Michael G. Findley, Daniel Nielson, et al. · Nature Human Behaviour (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS