Selection rules for pinned and quasipinned occupation numbers with degeneracy — E8 Intelligence Research

When the natural occupation numbers of a fermionic state saturate a generalized Pauli constraint, the state obeys a selection rule: only those configurations of natural orbitals that saturate the constraint themselves contribute. Pinning thus singles out an active space. The selection rule was proved for non-degenerate occupation numbers; for degenerate ones it was conjectured, and proved for one saturated constraint under an unverified assumption. Here, it is proved for every generalized Pauli constraint, with no assumption, and also in the spin-adapted setting. The rule can only fail for the ordering constraints $λ_j\geλ_{j+1}$. Several saturated constraints are served by one basis whenever their common zero face contains a non-degenerate point. In practice, occupation numbers are quasipinned rather than pinned, and I show what the rule then becomes. Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22010v1 (arXiv:2609.22010v1) Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24075408
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Selection rules for pinned and quasipinned occupation numbers with degeneracy — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
preprint

Selection rules for pinned and quasipinned occupation numbers with degeneracy — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

When the natural occupation numbers of a fermionic state saturate a generalized Pauli constraint, the state obeys a selection rule: only those configurations of natural orbitals that saturate the constraint themselves contribute. Pinning thus singles out an active space. The selection rule was proved for non-degenerate occupation numbers; for degenerate ones it was conjectured, and proved for one saturated constraint under an unverified assumption. Here, it is proved for every generalized Pauli constraint, with no assumption, and also in the spin-adapted setting. The rule can only fail for the ordering constraints $λ_j\geλ_{j+1}$. Several saturated constraints are served by one basis whenever their common zero face contains a non-degenerate point. In practice, occupation numbers are quasipinned rather than pinned, and I show what the rule then becomes. Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22010v1 (arXiv:2609.22010v1) Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon