Titan Vs NIST. A cross valdation Study

New cipher-evaluation toolkits are often published without evidence that their verdicts are correct. This paper calibrates TITAN, a 42-test, 14-category toolkit developed in India, against the NIST SP 800-22 statistical test suite. Both toolkits were applied to two ciphers: AES-256, the accepted reference, and Atom-Ocean v2, a 64-bit, 8-round Feistel cipher with a 256-bit key proposed by the author. A deliberately weak repeating-key XOR cipher served as a negative control.On the property both toolkits measure, statistical randomness, they agreed in all four ciphertoolkit cases. Under NIST, AES-256 passed 44 of 44 statistics across four independent runs (100%) and Atom-Ocean v2 passed 43 of 44 (97.7%); the single miss lay within chance. The weak control passed 0 of 11. Across 118 validated measurements (NIST and the corrected TITAN v3.1), AES-256 scored 98.3% and Atom-Ocean v2 97.5%, a difference that is not statistically meaningful.Calibration with AES also exposed four defects in TITAN's non-randomness categories: an ECB test defeated by padding, a diffusion test that depends on message length, a byte-level threshold set for bit-level data, and fixed thresholds that give unstable verdicts. The same cipher received grade C under TITAN v2 and grade A under v3. Further checks found two more: a serial test that misapplies the chi-square to overlapping patterns, and timing tests that flag even constant-time AES when run in Python. After seven corrections (TITAN v3.1), three repeated runs gave identical grades: AES-256 and Atom-Ocean v2 both scored A+ in CTR mode and B in ECB mode, failing only the two ECB-mode tests that any ECB cipher should fail, while the weak XOR and Caesar controls scored D and F.The contribution to cryptology is a reproducible method for validating any cipher-evaluation toolkit: agreement with NIST where the two overlap, and known-answer calibration with AES and a weak control where they do not. Passing these tests shows statistical soundness, not proof of Cryptography security

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24088564
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Titan Vs NIST. A cross valdation Study

S Ravichandran Ayyer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
preprint

Titan Vs NIST. A cross valdation Study

S Ravichandran Ayyer
preprint en

Abstract

New cipher-evaluation toolkits are often published without evidence that their verdicts are correct. This paper calibrates TITAN, a 42-test, 14-category toolkit developed in India, against the NIST SP 800-22 statistical test suite. Both toolkits were applied to two ciphers: AES-256, the accepted reference, and Atom-Ocean v2, a 64-bit, 8-round Feistel cipher with a 256-bit key proposed by the author. A deliberately weak repeating-key XOR cipher served as a negative control.On the property both toolkits measure, statistical randomness, they agreed in all four ciphertoolkit cases. Under NIST, AES-256 passed 44 of 44 statistics across four independent runs (100%) and Atom-Ocean v2 passed 43 of 44 (97.7%); the single miss lay within chance. The weak control passed 0 of 11. Across 118 validated measurements (NIST and the corrected TITAN v3.1), AES-256 scored 98.3% and Atom-Ocean v2 97.5%, a difference that is not statistically meaningful.Calibration with AES also exposed four defects in TITAN's non-randomness categories: an ECB test defeated by padding, a diffusion test that depends on message length, a byte-level threshold set for bit-level data, and fixed thresholds that give unstable verdicts. The same cipher received grade C under TITAN v2 and grade A under v3. Further checks found two more: a serial test that misapplies the chi-square to overlapping patterns, and timing tests that flag even constant-time AES when run in Python. After seven corrections (TITAN v3.1), three repeated runs gave identical grades: AES-256 and Atom-Ocean v2 both scored A+ in CTR mode and B in ECB mode, failing only the two ECB-mode tests that any ECB cipher should fail, while the weak XOR and Caesar controls scored D and F.The contribution to cryptology is a reproducible method for validating any cipher-evaluation toolkit: agreement with NIST where the two overlap, and known-answer calibration with AES and a weak control where they do not. Passing these tests shows statistical soundness, not proof of Cryptography security

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon